|
ADTRAN INC - 10-K - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Edgar Glimpses Via Acquire Media NewsEdge) Overview
ADTRAN, Inc. designs, manufactures and markets solutions and provides services
and support for communications networks. Our solutions are widely deployed by
providers of communications services (serviced by our Carrier Networks
Division), and small, mid-sized and distributed enterprises (serviced by our
Enterprise Networks Division), and enable voice, data, video and Internet
communications across a variety of network infrastructures. Many of these
solutions are currently in use by every major United States service provider,
many global service providers, as well as many public, private and governmental
organizations worldwide.
Our success depends upon our ability to increase unit volume and market share
through the introduction of new products and succeeding generations of products
having lower selling prices and increased functionality as compared to both the
prior generation of a product and to the products of competitors. An important
part of our strategy is to reduce the cost of each succeeding product generation
and then lower the product's selling price based on the cost savings achieved in
order to gain market share and/or improve gross margins. As a part of this
strategy, we seek in most instances to be a high-quality, low-cost provider of
products in our markets. Our success to date is attributable in large measure to
our ability to design our products initially with a view to their subsequent
redesign, allowing both increased functionality and reduced manufacturing costs
in each succeeding product generation. This strategy enables us to sell
succeeding generations of products to existing customers, while increasing our
market share by selling these enhanced products to new customers.
Our three major product categories are Carrier Systems, Business Networking and
Loop Access.
Carrier Systems products are used by communications service providers to provide
data, voice and video services to consumers and enterprises. This category
includes the following product areas and related services:
• Broadband Access
• Total Access®5000 Multi-Service Access and Aggregation Platform (MSAP)
• hiX family of MSAPs
• Total Access 1100/1200 Series of Fiber to the Node (FTTN) products
• Ultra Broadband Ethernet (UBE)
• Digital Subscriber Line Access Multiplexer (DSLAM) products
• Optical
• Optical Networking Edge (ONE)
• NetVanta 8000 Series
• OPTI and TA 3000 optical products
• Small Form-Factor Pluggable (SFP) products
• TDM systems
• Network Management Solutions
Business Networking products provide access to telecommunication services and
facilitate the delivery of cloud connectivity, enterprise communications and
virtual mobility to the small and mid-sized enterprise (SME) market. This
category includes the following product areas and related services:
• Internetworking products
• Total Access IP Business Gateways
• Optical Network Terminals (ONTs)
• Bluesocket®virtual Wireless LAN (vWLAN®)
• NetVanta®
• Multiservice Routers
• Managed Ethernet Switches
• Unified Communications (UC) solutions
• Carrier Ethernet Network Terminating Equipment (NTE)
• Network Management Solutions
• Integrated Access Devices (IADs)
26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Loop Access products are used by carrier and enterprise customers for access to
copper-based telecommunications networks. The Loop Access category includes the
following product areas:
• High bit-rate Digital Subscriber Line (HDSL) products
• Digital Data Service (DDS)
• Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) products
• T1/E1/T3 Channel Service Units/Data Service Units (CSUs/DSUs)
• TRACER fixed-wireless products
In addition, we identify subcategories of product revenues, which we divide into
core products and legacy products. Our core products consist of Broadband Access
and Optical products (included in Carrier Systems) and Internetworking products
(included in Business Networking). Our legacy products include HDSL products
(included in Loop Access) and other products not included in the aforementioned
core products. Many of our customers are migrating their networks to deliver
higher bandwidth services by utilizing newer technologies. We believe that
products and services offered in our core product areas position us well for
this migration. Despite occasional increases, we anticipate that revenues of
many of our legacy products, including HDSL, will decline over time; however,
revenues from these products may continue for years because of the time required
for our customers to transition to newer technologies.
Sales were $620.6 million in 2012 compared to $717.2 million in 2011 and $605.7
million in 2010. Total sales of products in our three core areas, Broadband
Access, Optical and Internetworking, decreased 1.7% in 2012 compared to 2011 and
increased 48.2% in 2011 compared to 2010. Our gross profit margin decreased in
2012 to 51.0% from 57.8% in 2011 and 59.3% in 2010. Net income was $47.3 million
in 2012 compared to $138.6 million in 2011 and $114.0 million in 2010. Earnings
per share, assuming dilution, were $0.74 in 2012 compared to $2.12 in 2011 and
$1.78 in 2010. Earnings per share in 2012, 2011 and 2010 include the effect of
the repurchase of 1.8 million, 1.1 million and 0.7 million shares of our stock
in those years, respectively.
Our operating results have fluctuated on a quarterly basis in the past, and may
vary significantly in future periods due to a number of factors, including
customer order activity and backlog. Backlog levels vary because of seasonal
trends, the timing of customer projects and other factors that affect customer
order lead times. Many of our customers require prompt delivery of products.
This requires us to maintain sufficient inventory levels to satisfy anticipated
customer demand. If near-term demand for our products declines, or if potential
sales in any quarter do not occur as anticipated, our financial results could be
adversely affected. Operating expenses are relatively fixed in the short term;
therefore, a shortfall in quarterly revenues could significantly impact our
financial results in a given quarter.
Our operating results may also fluctuate as a result of a number of other
factors, including a decline in general economic and market conditions,
increased competition, customer order patterns, changes in product and services
mix, timing differences between price decreases and product cost reductions,
product warranty returns, expediting costs and announcements of new products by
us or our competitors. Additionally, maintaining sufficient inventory levels to
assure prompt delivery of our products increases the amount of inventory that
may become obsolete and increases the risk that the obsolescence of this
inventory may have an adverse effect on our business and operating results.
Also, not maintaining sufficient inventory levels to assure prompt delivery of
our products may cause us to incur expediting costs to meet customer delivery
requirements, which may negatively impact our operating results in a given
quarter.
Accordingly, our historical financial performance is not necessarily a
meaningful indicator of future results, and, in general, management expects that
our financial results may vary from period to period. See Note 14 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. For a discussion
of risks associated with our operating results, see Item 1A of this report.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting
estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain
at the time the estimate is made, if different estimates reasonably could have
been used, or if changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely
to occur could materially impact the results of financial operations. We believe
the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments
and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
These policies have been consistently applied across our two reportable
segments: (1) Carrier Networks Division and (2) Enterprise Networks Division.
27
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
• We review customer contracts to determine if all of the requirements for
revenue recognition have been met prior to recording revenues from sales
transactions. We generally record sales revenue upon shipment of our
products, net of any rebates or discounts, since: (i) we generally do not
have significant post-delivery obligations, (ii) the product price is
fixed or determinable, (iii) collection of the resulting receivable is
probable, and (iv) product returns are reasonably estimable. We generally
ship products upon receipt of a purchase order from a customer. We
evaluate shipping terms and we record revenue on products shipped in
accordance with the terms of each respective contract where applicable, or
under our standard shipping terms for purchase orders accepted without a
contract, generally FOB shipping point. In the case of consigned
inventory, revenue is recognized when the customer assumes ownership of
the product. Contracts that contain multiple deliverables are evaluated to
determine the units of accounting, and the revenue from the arrangement is
allocated to each item requiring separate revenue recognition based on the
relative selling price and corresponding terms of the contract. We strive
to use vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price. When this
evidence is not available, we are generally not able to determine
third-party evidence of selling price because of the extent of
customization among competing products or services from other companies.
We record revenue associated with installation services when all
contractual obligations are complete. Contracts that include both
installation services and product sales are evaluated for revenue
recognition in accordance with the respective contract terms. As a result,
depending on contract terms, installation services may be considered as a
separate deliverable item or may be considered an element of the delivered
product. Either the purchaser, ADTRAN, or a third party can perform
installation of our products. Revenues related to maintenance services are
recognized on a straight line basis over the contract term.
• Sales returns are accrued based on historical sales return experience,
which we believe provides a reasonable estimate of future returns. A
significant portion of Enterprise Networks products are sold in the United
States through a non-exclusive distribution network of major technology
distributors. These organizations then distribute to an extensive network
of value-added resellers and system integrators. Value-added resellers and
system integrators may be affiliated with us as a channel partner, or they
may purchase from the distributor on an unaffiliated basis. Additionally,
with certain limitations, our distributors may return unused and unopened
product for stock-balancing purposes when these returns are accompanied by
offsetting orders for products of equal or greater value.
We participate in cooperative advertising and market development programs with
certain customers. We use these programs to reimburse customers for certain
forms of advertising, and in general, to allow our customers credits up to a
specified percentage of their net purchases. Our costs associated with these
programs are estimated and accrued at the time of sale and are included in
selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of
income. We also participate in rebate programs to provide sales incentives for
certain products. Our costs associated with these programs are estimated and
accrued at the time of sale and are recorded as a reduction of sales in our
consolidated statements of income.
Prior to issuing payment terms to a new customer, we perform a detailed credit
review of the customer. Credit limits and payment terms are established for each
new customer based on the results of this credit review. Collection experience
is reviewed periodically in order to determine if the customer's payment terms
and credit limits need to be revised. We maintain allowances for doubtful
accounts for losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make
required payments. If the financial condition of our customers deteriorates,
resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, we may be required
to make additional allowances. If circumstances change with regard to individual
receivable balances that have previously been determined to be uncollectible
(and for which a specific reserve has been established), a reduction in our
allowance for doubtful accounts may be required. Our allowance for doubtful
accounts was $6 thousand at December 31, 2012 and $8 thousand at December 31,
2011.
• We carry our inventory at the lower of cost or market, with cost being
determined using the first-in, first-out method. We use standard costs for
material, labor, and manufacturing overhead to value our inventory. Our
standard costs are updated on at least a quarterly basis and any variances
are expensed in the current period; therefore, our inventory costs
approximate actual costs at the end of each reporting period. We write
down our inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory by
an amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the
estimated fair value based upon assumptions about future demand and market
conditions. If actual future demand or market conditions are less
favorable than those projected by management, we may be required to make
additional inventory write-downs. Our reserve for excess and obsolete
inventory was $12.0 million and $9.4 million at December 31, 2012 and
2011, respectively. Inventory write-downs charged to the reserve were $0.5
million, $0.7 million and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31,
2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
• The objective of our short-term investment policy is to preserve principal
and maintain adequate liquidity with appropriate diversification, while
achieving market returns. The objective of our long-term investment policy
is principal preservation and total return; that is, the aggregate return
from capital appreciation, dividend income, and interest income. These
objectives are achieved through investments with appropriate
diversification in fixed and variable rate income securities, public
equity, and private equity portfolios. Our investment policy provides
limitations for issuer concentration, which limits, at the time of
purchase, the concentration in any one issuer to 5% of the market value of
our total investment portfolio. We have experienced significant volatility
in the market prices of our publicly traded equity investments. These
investments are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value
with unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of accumulated
other comprehensive income, net of tax. The ultimate realized value on
these equity investments is subject to market price volatility.
28
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
We have categorized our cash equivalents held in money market funds and our
investments held at fair value into a three-level fair value hierarchy based on
the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique for the cash equivalents
and investments as follows: Level 1 - Values based on unadjusted quoted prices
for identical assets or liabilities in an active market; Level 2 - Values based
on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are
observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the
asset or liability; Level 3 - Values based on prices or valuation techniques
that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall
fair value measurement. These inputs include information supplied by investees.
At December 31, 2012, we categorized $47.2 million and $395.9 million of our
available-for-sale investments as Level 1 and Level 2, respectively, and $28.1
million of our cash equivalents as Level 1. At December 31, 2011, we categorized
$39.7 million and $401.2 million of our available-for-sale investments as Level
1 and Level 2, respectively, and $13.7 million of our cash equivalents as Level
1.
We review our investment portfolio for potential "other-than-temporary" declines
in value on an individual investment basis. We assess, on a quarterly basis,
significant declines in value which may be considered other-than-temporary and,
if necessary, recognize and record the appropriate charge to write-down the
carrying value of such investments. In making this assessment, we take into
consideration qualitative and quantitative information, including but not
limited to the following: the magnitude and duration of historical declines in
market prices, credit rating activity, assessments of liquidity, public filings,
and statements made by the issuer. We generally begin our identification of
potential other-than-temporary impairments by reviewing any security with a fair
value that has declined from its original or adjusted cost basis by 25% or more
for six or more consecutive months. We then evaluate the individual security
based on the previously identified factors to determine the amount of the
write-down, if any. As a result of our review, we recorded an
other-than-temporary impairment charge of $17 thousand during the fourth quarter
of 2012. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we recorded
charges of $0.7 million, $68 thousand and $43 thousand, respectively, related to
the other-than-temporary impairment of certain publicly traded equity
securities, a fixed income bond fund, and our deferred compensation plan assets.
Actual losses, if any, could ultimately differ from these estimates. Future
adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of underlying
investments could result in additional losses that may not be reflected in an
investment's current carrying value, thereby possibly requiring an impairment
charge in the future. See Note 4 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in this report for more information about our investments.
We also invest in privately held entities and private equity funds and record
these investments at cost. We review these investments periodically in order to
determine if circumstances (both financial and non-financial) exist that
indicate that we will not recover our initial investment. Impairment charges are
recorded on investments having a cost basis that is greater than the value that
we would reasonably expect to receive in an arm's length sale of the investment.
We have not been required to record any impairment losses relating to these
investments in 2012, 2011 or 2010.
• For purposes of determining the estimated fair value of our stock option
awards on the date of grant, we use the Black-Scholes Model. This model
requires the input of certain assumptions that require subjective
judgment. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, expected
stock price volatility over the term of the awards and actual and
projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. Because our stock
option awards have characteristics significantly different from those of
traded options, and because changes in the input assumptions can
materially affect the fair value estimate, the existing model may not
provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our stock option
awards. For purposes of determining the estimated fair value of our
performance-based restricted stock unit awards on the date of grant, we
use a Monte Carlo Simulation valuation method. The restricted stock units
are subject to a market condition based on the relative total shareholder
return of ADTRAN against all of the companies in the NASDAQ
Telecommunications Index and vest at the end of a three-year performance
period. The fair value of restricted stock issued to our Directors in 2012
is equal to the closing price of our stock on the date of grant.
Management will continue to assess the assumptions and methodologies used
to calculate the estimated fair value of stock-based compensation.
Circumstances may change and additional data may become available over
time, which could result in changes to these assumptions and methodologies
and thereby materially impact our fair value determination. If factors
change in future periods, the compensation expense that we record may
differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period.
29
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
• We estimate our income tax provision or benefit in each of the
jurisdictions in which we operate, including estimating exposures related
to examinations by taxing authorities. We also make judgments regarding
the realization of deferred tax assets, and establish reserves where we
believe it is more likely than not that future taxable income in certain
jurisdictions will be insufficient to realize these deferred tax assets.
Our estimates regarding future taxable income and income tax provision or
benefit may vary due to changes in market conditions, changes in tax laws,
or other factors. If our assumptions, and consequently our estimates,
change in the future, the valuation allowances we have established may be
increased or decreased, impacting future income tax expense. At
December 31, 2012 and 2011 respectively, the valuation allowance was $10.9
million and $7.6 million. As of December 31, 2012, we have state research
tax credit carry-forwards of $3.1 million, which will expire between 2015
and 2027. These carry-forwards were caused by tax credits in excess of our
annual tax liabilities to an individual state where we no longer generate
sufficient state income. In addition, as of December 31, 2012, we have a
deferred tax asset of $8.2 million relating to current losses and net
operating loss carry-forwards generated by our domestic and foreign
subsidiaries which will expire between 2013 and 2030. These carry-forwards
are the result of acquisitions in 2009 and in 2011, plus losses generated
in 2012 by a foreign entity. The acquired net operating losses are in
excess of the amount of estimated earnings. We believe it is more likely
than not that we will not realize the full benefits of our deferred tax
asset arising from these credits and net operating losses, and
accordingly, have provided a valuation allowance against them. This
valuation allowance is included in non-current deferred tax liabilities in
the accompanying balance sheets.
• Our products generally include warranties of 90 days to ten years for
product defects. We accrue for warranty returns at the time revenue is
recognized based on our estimate of the cost to repair or replace the
defective products. We engage in extensive product quality programs and
processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of our
component suppliers. Our products continue to become more complex in both
size and functionality as many of our product offerings migrate from line
card applications to systems products. The increasing complexity of our
products will cause warranty incidences, when they arise, to be more
costly. Our estimates regarding future warranty obligations may change due
to product failure rates, material usage, and other rework costs incurred
in correcting a product failure. In addition, from time to time, specific
warranty accruals may be recorded if unforeseen problems arise. Should our
actual experience relative to these factors be worse than our estimates,
we will be required to record additional warranty expense. Alternatively,
if we provide for more reserves than we require, we will reverse a portion
of such provisions in future periods. The liability for warranty returns
totaled $9.7 million and $4.1 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011,
respectively. These liabilities are included in accrued expenses in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
• We use the acquisition method to account for business combinations. Under
the acquisition method of accounting, we recognize the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at their fair value on the acquisition date. Goodwill
is measured as the excess of the consideration transferred over the net
assets acquired. The acquisition method of accounting requires us to
exercise judgment and make significant estimates and assumptions regarding
the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including
the fair values of inventory, unearned revenue, warranty liabilities,
identifiable intangible assets and deferred tax asset valuation
allowances. This method also requires us to refine these estimates over a
one-year measurement period to reflect information obtained about facts
and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known,
would have affected the measurement of the asset and liabilities recorded
on that date, which could affect our net income.
• We evaluate the carrying value of goodwill during the fourth quarter of
each year and between annual evaluations if events occur or circumstances
change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the
reporting unit below its carrying amount. When evaluating whether goodwill
is impaired, we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it
is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment
test. If we determine that the two-step quantitative test is necessary,
then we compare the fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill
is assigned to the reporting unit's carrying amount, including goodwill.
If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then
the amount of the impairment loss is measured. We passed the qualitative
assessment in 2012 and 2011; therefore, we did not complete a quantitative
assessment. As a result, there were no impairment losses recognized during
2012 or 2011.
30
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table presents selected financial information derived from our
consolidated statements of income expressed as a percentage of sales for the
years indicated.
Year Ended December 31, 2012 2011 2010
Sales
Carrier Networks Division 79.3 % 79.4 % 78.6 %
Enterprise Networks Division 20.7 20.6 21.4
Total sales 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %
Cost of sales 49.0 42.2 40.7
Gross profit 51.0 57.8 59.3
Selling, general and administrative expenses 21.7 17.4 19.0
Research and development expenses 20.3 14.0 14.9
Operating income 9.1 26.4 25.4
Interest and dividend income 1.2 1.1 1.1
Interest expense (0.4 ) (0.3 ) (0.4 )
Net realized investment gain 1.5 1.7 1.8
Other income (expense), net - (0.1 ) (0.1 )
Gain on bargain purchase of a business 0.3 - -
Income before provision for income taxes 11.8 28.7 27.8
Provision for income taxes (4.1 ) (9.4 ) (9.0 )
Net income 7.6 % 19.3 % 18.8 %
31
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Acquisition Expenses
On August 4, 2011, we closed on the acquisition of Bluesocket, Inc. and on
May 4, 2012, we closed on the acquisition of the NSN BBA business. Acquisition
related expenses, amortizations and adjustments for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2012 and 2011 for both transactions are as follows:
(In Thousands) 2012 2011
Bluesocket, Inc. acquisition
Amortization of acquired intangible assets $ 1,020 $ 495
Amortization of other purchase accounting adjustments 443 521
Acquisition related professional fees, travel and other
expenses - 730
Subtotal 1,463 1,746
NSN BBA acquisition
Amortization of acquired intangible assets 762 -
Amortization of other purchase accounting adjustments 2,305 -
Acquisition related professional fees, travel and other
expenses
4,860 2,027
Subtotal 7,927 2,027
Total acquisition related expenses, amortizations and
adjustments
9,390 3,773
Tax effect (3,148 ) (1,434 )
Total acquisition related expenses, amortizations and
adjustments, net of tax
$ 6,242 $ 2,339
The acquisition related expenses, amortizations and adjustments above were
recorded in the following Consolidated Statements of Income categories for the
twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:
(In Thousands) 2012 2011
Revenue (adjustments to unearned revenue recognized in
the period) $ 1,528 $ 362
Cost of goods sold 1,086 165
Subtotal 2,614 527
Selling, general and administrative expenses 4,510 2,557
Research and development expenses 2,266 689
Subtotal 6,776 3,246
Total acquisition related expenses, amortizations and
adjustments
9,390 3,773
Tax effect (3,148 ) (1,434 )
Total acquisition related expenses, amortizations and
adjustments, net of tax $ 6,242 $ 2,339
2012 Compared to 2011
Sales
ADTRAN's sales decreased 13.5% from $717.2 million in 2011 to $620.6 million in
2012. The decrease in sales is primarily attributable to an $87.6 million
decrease in sales of our HDSL and other legacy products, a $30.8 million
decrease in sales of our Optical products, an $8.6 million decrease in sales of
our Internetworking products, partially offset by a $30.3 million increase in
sales of our Broadband Access products.
32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Carrier Networks sales decreased 13.6% from $569.6 million in 2011 to $492.1
million in 2012. The decrease is primarily attributable to decreases in sales of
Optical products, HDSL products and other legacy products. These declines were
partially offset by the added sales of the NSN BBA business and an increase in
sales of our Internetworking NTE products. Our organic Broadband Access sales in
2012 were negatively impacted by decreased capital expenditures at two
substantial Broadband Access customers. The decrease in sales of Optical
products in 2012 is primarily attributable to the market transitioning to
Ethernet and our transition to new products to address this market. The
declining trend in HDSL and other legacy products has been expected as we evolve
our products towards packet-based technologies, but was larger than anticipated
due to a large carrier customer that initiated a significant acceleration of
their installed inventory reuse program.
Enterprise Networks sales decreased 13.0% from $147.7 million in 2011 to $128.5
million in 2012. The decrease is attributable to decreases in sales of
Internetworking products and legacy products. The decrease in Internetworking
product sales in 2012 is primarily due to a decline in Carrier spending caused
by the macroeconomic environment, partially offset by growth in the value-added
reseller channel and by the addition of our vWLAN solutions. Internetworking
product sales attributable to Enterprise Networks were 91.5% of the division's
sales in 2012 compared with 87.4% in 2011. Legacy products primarily comprise
the remainder of Enterprise Networks sales. Enterprise Networks sales as a
percentage of total sales increased from 20.6% in 2011 to 20.7% in 2012.
International sales, which are included in the Carrier Networks and Enterprise
Networks amounts discussed above, increased 77.9% from $84.4 million in 2011 to
$150.2 million in 2012. International sales, as a percentage of total sales,
increased from 11.8% in 2011 to 24.2% in 2012. The increase in international
sales in 2012 was primarily due to sales attributable to the acquired NSN BBA
business and an increase in organic sales in Latin America.
Carrier Systems product sales decreased $20.6 million in 2012 compared to 2011
primarily due to a $30.8 million decrease in Optical product sales and a $20.2
million decrease in legacy product sales, partially offset by an increase of
$30.3 million in Broadband Access product sales. The decrease in sales of
Optical products in 2012 is primarily attributable to the market transitioning
to Ethernet and our transition to new products to address this market. The
increase in Broadband Access product sales was due to the added sales of the NSN
BBA business, partially offset by a decline in organic Broadband Access product
sales. Our organic Broadband Access sales in 2012 were negatively impacted by
decreased capital expenditures at two substantial Broadband Access customers.
Business Networking product sales decreased $12.9 million in 2012 compared to
2011 primarily due to an $8.6 million decrease in Internetworking product sales
across both divisions and a $4.3 million decrease in legacy product sales. The
decrease in Internetworking product sales in 2012 is primarily due to a decline
in Carrier spending caused by the macroeconomic environment, partially offset by
growth in the value-added reseller channel and by the addition of our vWLAN
solutions. The decrease in sales of legacy products is a result of customers
shifting to newer technologies. Many of these newer technologies are integral to
our Internetworking product area.
Loop Access product sales decreased $63.1 million in 2012 compared to 2011
primarily due to a $60.0 million decrease in HDSL product sales. The declining
trend in HDSL and other legacy products has been expected as we evolve our
products towards packet-based technologies, but was larger than anticipated due
to a large carrier customer that initiated a significant acceleration of their
installed inventory reuse program.
Cost of Sales
As a percentage of sales, cost of sales increased from 42.2% in 2011 to 49.0% in
2012. The increase was primarily attributable to lower gross margins related to
the acquired NSN BBA business, lower cost absorption due to the lower production
volumes, customer price movements to achieve market share position and higher
warranty costs.
Carrier Networks cost of sales increased from 42.4% of sales in 2011 to 49.7% of
sales in 2012. The increase in Carrier Networks cost of sales as a percentage of
sales was primarily attributable to lower gross margins related to the acquired
NSN BBA business, lower cost absorption due to the lower production volumes,
customer price movements to achieve market share position and higher warranty
costs.
Enterprise Networks cost of sales increased from 41.4% of sales in 2011 to 46.1%
of sales in 2012. The increase in Enterprise Networks cost of sales as a
percentage of sales was primarily attributable to lower cost absorption due to
the lower production volumes and customer price movements to achieve market
share position.
An important part of our strategy is to reduce the product cost of each
succeeding product generation and then to lower the product's price based on the
cost savings achieved. This may cause variations in our gross profit percentage
due to timing differences between the recognition of cost reductions and the
lowering of product selling prices.
33
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 7.7% from $124.9 million
in 2011 to $134.5 million in 2012. Selling, general and administrative expenses
include personnel costs for administration, finance, information systems, human
resources, sales and marketing, and general management, as well as rent,
utilities, legal and accounting expenses, bad debt expense, advertising,
promotional material, trade show expenses, and related travel costs. The
increase in selling, general and administrative expenses is primarily related to
increases in staffing and fringe benefit costs due to increased headcount,
professional services, legal services and amortization of acquired intangible
assets. These increases were primarily related to the NSN BBA business, which
was acquired on May 4, 2012, and Bluesocket Inc., which was acquired on August
4, 2011.
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales increased
from 17.4% for the year ended December 31, 2011 to 21.7% for the year ended
December 31, 2012. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of
sales will generally fluctuate whenever there is a significant fluctuation in
revenues for the periods being compared.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses increased 25.6% from $100.3 million in 2011 to
$126.0 million in 2012. The increase in research and development expense is
primarily related to increases in staffing and fringe benefit costs due to
increased headcount, including expenses and increased headcount related to the
NSN BBA business acquired on May 4, 2012 and Bluesocket, Inc., which was
acquired on August 4, 2011, amortization of acquired intangible assets related
to both acquisitions, and increases in independent contractor expense and office
lease expense related to the NSN BBA business.
Research and development expenses as a percentage of sales increased from 14.0%
for the year ended December 31, 2011 to 20.3% for the year ended December 31,
2012. Research and development expenses as a percentage of sales will fluctuate
whenever there are incremental product development activities or a significant
fluctuation in revenues for the periods being compared.
We expect to continue to incur research and development expenses in connection
with our new and existing products and our expansion into international markets.
We continually evaluate new product opportunities and engage in intensive
research and product development efforts which provide for new product
development, enhancement of existing products and product cost reductions. We
may incur significant research and development expenses prior to the receipt of
revenues from a major new product group.
Interest and Dividend Income
Interest and dividend income remained consistent at $7.6 million in 2011 and
$7.7 million in 2012, as we had no substantial change in interest-bearing
investment balances or interest rates.
Interest Expense
Interest expense remained consistent at $2.4 million in 2011 and $2.3 million in
2012, as we had no substantial change in our fixed rate borrowing. See
"Liquidity and Capital Resources" below for additional information.
Net Realized Investment Gain (Loss)
Net realized investment gain (loss) decreased from a $12.5 million gain in 2011
to a $9.6 million gain in 2012. This change is primarily related to a $1.3
million decrease related to sales of marketable equity securities and impaired
marketable equity securities, a $0.6 million decrease in distributions from two
private equity funds, and a $0.6 million increase in impairment of deferred
compensation plan assets. See "Investing Activities" in "Liquidity and Capital
Resources" below for additional information.
Other Income (Expense), net
Other income (expense), net, comprised primarily of miscellaneous income, gains
and losses on foreign currency transactions, investment account management fees,
and gains or losses on the disposal of property, plant and equipment occurring
in the normal course of business, changed from $0.7 million of expense in 2011
to $0.2 million of income in 2012.
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate increased from 32.8% in 2011 to 35.2% in 2012. This
increase is primarily attributable to the exclusion of the research tax credit
in 2012 and our inability to utilize losses generated by our foreign
subsidiaries where a full valuation allowance was provided. These tax rate
increases were partially offset by increased state tax incentives in 2012. In
2013, we will recognize a benefit from the research tax credit related to 2012
and 2013, of which we estimate $3.1 million will be attributable to 2012.
34
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Net Income
As a result of the above factors, net income decreased from $138.6 million in
2011 to $47.3 million in 2012. As a percentage of sales, net income decreased
from 19.3% in 2011 to 7.6% in 2012.
2011 Compared to 2010
Sales
ADTRAN's sales increased 18.4% from $605.7 million in 2010 to $717.2 million in
2011. This increase in sales is primarily attributable to a $113.7 million
increase in sales of our Broadband Access products, a $40.4 million increase in
sales of our Internetworking products, a $16.3 million increase in sales of our
Optical products, partially offset by a $58.8 million decrease in sales of our
HDSL and other legacy products.
Carrier Networks sales increased 19.7% from $476.0 million in 2010 to $569.6
million in 2011. The increase is primarily attributable to increases in
Broadband Access, Optical and Internetworking NTE product sales, partially
offset by a decrease in HDSL and other legacy product sales.
Enterprise Networks sales increased 13.9% from $129.6 million in 2010 to $147.7
million in 2011. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in sales
of Internetworking products, partially offset by decreases in sales of legacy
products. Internetworking product sales attributable to Enterprise Networks were
87.4% of the division's sales in 2011 compared with 77.3% in 2010. Legacy
products primarily comprise the remainder of Enterprise Networks sales.
Enterprise Networks sales as a percentage of total sales decreased from 21.4% in
2010 to 20.6% in 2011.
International sales, which are included in the Carrier Networks and Enterprise
Networks amounts discussed above, increased 165.3% from $31.8 million in 2010 to
$84.4 million in 2011. International sales, as a percentage of total sales,
increased from 5.3% in 2010 to 11.8% in 2011. The increase in international
sales in 2011 was primarily due to an increase in sales to Latin America,
Asia-Pacific and Europe regions.
Carrier Systems product sales increased $131.0 million in 2011 compared to 2010
primarily due to a $113.7 million increase in Broadband Access product sales and
a $16.3 million increase in Optical product sales. The increase in Broadband
Access product sales was primarily attributable to continued growth in
deployments of our Total Access 5000 and Fiber-to-the-Node platforms.
Business Networking product sales increased $35.0 million in 2011 compared to
2010 primarily due to a $40.4 million increase in Internetworking product sales
across both divisions, partially offset by a $5.8 million decrease in legacy
product sales. The decrease in sales of legacy products is a result of customers
shifting to newer technologies. Many of these newer technologies are integral to
our Internetworking product area.
Loop Access product sales decreased $54.4 million in 2011 compared to 2010
primarily due to a $50.3 million decrease in HDSL product sales.
Cost of Sales
As a percentage of sales, cost of sales increased from 40.7% in 2010 to 42.2% in
2011. The increase was primarily the result of higher services related revenue
including cabinet shipments, and specific customer price movements related to
market share expansion. These effects were partially offset by cost absorption
and manufacturing efficiencies achieved at the higher production volumes.
Carrier Networks cost of sales increased from 40.5% of sales in 2010 to 42.4% of
sales in 2011. The increase in Carrier Networks cost of sales as a percentage of
sales was primarily attributable to higher services related revenue including
cabinet shipments, and specific customer price movements related to market share
expansion.
Enterprise Networks cost of sales decreased from 41.7% of sales in 2010 to 41.4%
of sales in 2011. The decrease in Enterprise Networks cost of sales as a
percentage of sales was primarily attributable to cost absorption and
manufacturing efficiencies achieved at higher production volumes.
35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
An important part of our strategy is to reduce the product cost of each
succeeding product generation and then to lower the product's price based on the
cost savings achieved. This may cause variations in our gross profit percentage
due to timing differences between the recognition of cost reductions and the
lowering of product selling prices.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 8.9% from $114.7 million
in 2010 to $124.9 million in 2011. Selling, general and administrative expenses
include personnel costs for administration, finance, information systems, human
resources, sales and marketing, and general management, as well as rent,
utilities, legal and accounting expenses, bad debt expense, advertising,
promotional material, trade show expenses, and related travel costs. The
increase in selling, general and administrative expenses is primarily related to
increases in staffing and fringe benefit costs due to increased headcount,
contract services, professional services, recruiting expenses and travel
expenses. These increases included expenses related to Bluesocket, Inc., which
was acquired on August 4, 2011, and the announced planned acquisition of Nokia
Siemens Networks Broadband Access business.
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales decreased
from 18.9% for the year ended December 31, 2010 to 17.4% for the year ended
December 31, 2011. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of
sales will generally fluctuate whenever there is a significant fluctuation in
revenues for the periods being compared.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses increased 11.1% from $90.3 million in 2010 to
$100.3 million in 2011. The increase in research and development expense is
primarily related to increases in staffing and fringe benefit costs due to
increased headcount. These increases included research and development expenses
related to Bluesocket, Inc., and amortization of intangible assets related to
the acquisition of Bluesocket, Inc.
Research and development expenses as a percentage of sales decreased from 14.9%
for the year ended December 31, 2010 to 14.0% for the year ended December 31,
2011. Research and development expenses as a percentage of sales will fluctuate
whenever there are incremental product development activities or a significant
fluctuation in revenues for the periods being compared.
We expect to continue to incur research and development expenses in connection
with our new and existing products and our expansion into international markets.
We continually evaluate new product opportunities and engage in intensive
research and product development efforts which provide for new product
development, enhancement of existing products and product cost reductions. We
may incur significant research and development expenses prior to the receipt of
revenues from a major new product group.
Interest and Dividend Income
Interest and dividend income increased 16.5% from $6.6 million in 2010 to $7.6
million in 2011. This increase was primarily attributable to a 19.9% increase in
our average investment balances, partially offset by a 22.6% reduction in the
average rate of return on our investments as a result of lower interest rates.
Interest Expense
Interest expense remained consistent at $2.4 million in 2011 and 2010, as we had
no substantial change in our fixed rate borrowing. See "Liquidity and Capital
Resources" below for additional information.
Net Realized Investment Gain (Loss)
Net realized investment gain (loss) increased from an $11.0 million gain in 2010
to a $12.5 million gain in 2011. This change is related to a $0.7 million
increase related to sales of marketable equity securities and an increase of
$0.8 million related to distributions from two private equity funds. See
"Investing Activities" in "Liquidity and Capital Resources" below for additional
information.
Other Income (Expense), net
Other income (expense), net, comprised primarily of miscellaneous income, gains
and losses on foreign currency transactions, investment account management fees,
and gains or losses on the disposal of property, plant and equipment occurring
in the normal course of business, decreased from $0.8 million of expense in 2010
to $0.7 million of expense in 2011.
36
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate increased from 32.2% in 2010 to 32.8% in 2011. This
increase is primarily due to the reduced impact of available statutory tax
benefits applied to the increased level of pretax income in 2011. The statutory
benefits include the research tax credit, deduction for domestic manufacturing
under Internal Revenue Code Section 199 and stock option related tax benefits.
Net Income
As a result of the above factors, net income increased from $114.0 million in
2010 to $138.6 million in 2011. As a percentage of sales, net income increased
from 18.8% in 2010 to 19.3% in 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
We intend to finance our operations with cash flow from operations. We have
used, and expect to continue to use, the cash generated from operations for
working capital, purchases of treasury stock, shareholder dividends, and other
general corporate purposes, including (i) product development activities to
enhance our existing products and develop new products and (ii) expansion of
sales and marketing activities. We believe our cash and cash equivalents,
investments and cash generated from operations to be adequate to meet our
operating and capital needs for the foreseeable future.
At December 31, 2012, cash on hand was $68.5 million and short-term investments
were $160.5 million, which placed our short-term liquidity at $228.9 million. At
December 31, 2011, our cash on hand of $43.0 million and short-term investments
of $159.3 million placed our short-term liquidity at $202.3 million. The
increase in short-term liquidity from 2011 to 2012 primarily reflects funds
provided by our operating activities, proceeds from stock option exercises, cash
received from NSN as a result of our acquisition of the NSN BBA business and
long-term corporate bonds moving to short-term status, partially offset by
equipment acquisitions, share repurchases and shareholder dividends.
Operating Activities
Our working capital, which consists of current assets less current liabilities,
increased 3.1% from $329.3 million as of December 31, 2011 to $339.4 million as
of December 31, 2012. The quick ratio, defined as cash and cash equivalents,
short-term investments, and net accounts receivable, divided by current
liabilities, decreased from 4.50 as of December 31, 2011 to 2.90 as of
December 31, 2012. The current ratio, defined as current assets divided by
current liabilities, decreased from 6.32 as of December 31, 2011 to 4.18 as of
December 31, 2012. The changes in our working capital, quick ratio and current
ratio are primarily attributable to changes in the underlying assets and
liabilities, including unearned revenue balances, relating to the acquired NSN
BBA business.
Net accounts receivable increased 6.7% from $76.1 million at December 31, 2011
to $81.2 million at December 31, 2012. Our allowance for doubtful accounts
decreased from $8 thousand at December 31, 2011 to $6 thousand at December 31,
2012. Quarterly accounts receivable days sales outstanding (DSO) increased from
40 days as of December 31, 2011 to 53 days as of December 31, 2012. The change
in net accounts receivable and DSO is due to an increase in international sales
as a percentage of our total sales, which typically have longer payment terms
than our U.S. customers. Other receivables increased from $9.7 million at
December 31, 2011 to $16.3 million at December 31, 2012. At December 31, 2012,
other receivables included an estimated receivable due from NSN related to
working capital adjustments under negotiation. Other receivables will also
fluctuate due to the timing of shipments and collections for materials supplied
to our contract manufacturers during the quarter.
Quarterly inventory turnover decreased from 3.5 turns as of December 31, 2011 to
2.8 turns as of December 31, 2012. Inventory increased 16.8% from December 31,
2011 to December 31, 2012. The increase in inventory is primarily attributable
to inventories acquired during the acquisition of the NSN BBA business,
increased installation services business and the timing of acceptances of
broadband stimulus projects. We expect inventory levels to fluctuate as we
attempt to maintain sufficient inventory in response to seasonal cycles of our
business ensuring competitive lead times while managing the risk of inventory
obsolescence that may occur due to rapidly changing technology and customer
demand.
Accounts payable increased 43.4% from $29.4 million at December 31, 2011 to
$42.2 million at December 31, 2012. The increase in accounts payable is
primarily attributable to accounts payable related to the acquired NSN BBA
business. Additionally, accounts payable will fluctuate due to variations in the
timing of the receipt of supplies, inventory and services and our subsequent
payments for these purchases.
37
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Investing Activities
Capital expenditures totaled approximately $12.1 million, $11.9 million and $9.9
million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
These expenditures were primarily used to purchase computer hardware, software
and manufacturing and test equipment.
On May 4, 2012, we acquired the NSN BBA business. This acquisition provides us
with an established customer base in key markets and complementary,
market-focused products and was accounted for as a business combination. We
received a cash payment of $7.5 million from NSN and recorded a bargain purchase
gain of $1.8 million, net of income taxes, subject to customary working capital
adjustments between the parties. We are currently negotiating the final working
capital adjustments in accordance with the provisions of the underlying purchase
agreement.
Our combined short-term and long-term investments increased $1.9 million from
$491.4 million at December 31, 2011 to $493.2 million at December 31, 2012. This
increase reflects the impact of additional funds available for investment
provided by our operating activities and proceeds from stock option exercises by
our employees, reduced by our cash needs for equipment acquisitions, share
repurchases and shareholder dividends, as well as net realized and unrealized
losses and amortization of net premiums on our combined investments.
We invest all available cash not required for immediate use in operations
primarily in securities that we believe bear minimal risk of loss. At
December 31, 2012 these investments included corporate bonds of $186.4 million,
municipal fixed-rate bonds of $175.1 million and municipal variable rate demand
notes of $34.4 million. At December 31, 2011, these investments included
corporate bonds of $156.8 million, municipal fixed-rate bonds of $174.8 million
and municipal variable rate demand notes of $69.7 million. As of December 31,
2012, our corporate bonds, municipal fixed-rate bonds, and municipal variable
rate demand notes were classified as available-for-sale and had a combined
duration of 1.03 years with an average credit rating of AA-. Because our bond
portfolio has a high quality rating and contractual maturities of a short
duration, we are able to obtain prices for these bonds derived from observable
market inputs, or for similar securities traded in an active market, on a daily
basis.
Our long-term investments increased 0.2% from $332.0 million at December 31,
2011 to $332.7 million at December 31, 2012. Long-term investments at
December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 included an investment in a certificate
of deposit of $48.3 million, which serves as collateral for our revenue bonds,
as discussed below. We have various equity investments included in long-term
investments at a cost of $21.0 million and $12.8 million, and with a fair value
of $35.2 million and $31.3 million, at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011,
respectively.
Long-term investments at December 31, 2012 and 2011 also included $11.5 million
and $7.7 million, respectively, related to our deferred compensation plan; $1.9
million and $2.1 million, respectively, of other investments carried at cost,
consisting of interests in two private equity funds and an investment in a
privately held telecommunications equipment manufacturer; and $0.5 million and
$0.7 million, respectively, of a fixed income bond fund.
We review our investment portfolio for potential "other-than-temporary" declines
in value on an individual investment basis. We assess, on a quarterly basis,
significant declines in value which may be considered other-than-temporary and,
if necessary, recognize and record the appropriate charge to write-down the
carrying value of such investments. In making this assessment, we take into
consideration qualitative and quantitative information, including but not
limited to the following: the magnitude and duration of historical declines in
market prices, credit rating activity, assessments of liquidity, public filings,
and statements made by the issuer. We generally begin our identification of
potential other-than-temporary impairments by reviewing any security with a fair
value that has declined from its original or adjusted cost basis by 25% or more
for six or more consecutive months. We then evaluate the individual security
based on the previously identified factors to determine the amount of the
write-down, if any. As a result of our review, we recorded an
other-than-temporary impairment charge of $17 thousand during the fourth quarter
of 2012 related to three marketable equity securities. For the years ended
December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 we recorded charges of $0.7 million, $68
thousand and $43 thousand, respectively, related to the other-than-temporary
impairment of certain publicly traded equity securities, a fixed income bond
fund, and our deferred compensation plan assets.
Financing Activities
In conjunction with an expansion of our Huntsville, Alabama, facility, we were
approved for participation in an incentive program offered by the State of
Alabama Industrial Development Authority (the "Authority"). Pursuant to the
program, on January 13, 1995, the Authority issued $20.0 million of its taxable
revenue bonds and loaned the proceeds from the sale of the bonds to ADTRAN. The
bonds were originally purchased by AmSouth Bank of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
(the "Bank"). Wachovia Bank, N.A., Nashville, Tennessee (formerly First Union
National Bank of Tennessee) (the "Bondholder"), which was acquired by Wells
Fargo & Company on December 31, 2008, purchased the original bonds from the Bank
and made further advances to the Authority, bringing the total amount
outstanding to $50.0 million. An Amended and Restated Taxable Revenue Bond
("Amended and Restated Bond") was issued and the original financing agreement
was amended. The Amended and Restated Bond bears interest, payable monthly. The
interest rate is 5% per annum. The Amended and Restated Bond matures on
January 1, 2020. The estimated fair value of the bond at December 31, 2012 was
approximately $48.8 million, based on a debt security with a comparable interest
rate and maturity and a Standard & Poor's credit rating of A. We are required to
make payments to the Authority in amounts necessary to pay the principal of and
interest on the Amended and Restated Bond. Included in long-term investments at
December 31, 2012 is $48.3 million which is invested in a restricted certificate
of deposit. These funds serve as a collateral deposit against the principal of
this bond, and we have the right to set-off the balance of the Bond with the
collateral deposit in order to reduce the balance of the indebtedness.
38
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
In conjunction with this program, we are eligible to receive certain economic
incentives from the state of Alabama that reduce the amount of payroll
withholdings that we are required to remit to the state for those employment
positions that qualify under the program. For the years ended December 31, 2012,
2011 and 2010, we realized economic incentives related to payroll withholdings
totaling $1.4 million, $1.9 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
We are required to make payments in the amounts necessary to pay the principal
and interest on the amounts currently outstanding. Based on positive cash flow
from operating activities, we have decided to continue early partial redemptions
of the Bond. We made principal payments of $0.5 million and $1.0 million for the
years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. It is our intent to make
annual principal payments in addition to the interest amounts that are due. In
connection with this decision, $0.5 million of the bond debt has been
reclassified to a current liability in accounts payable in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012 and 2011.
The following table shows dividends paid to our shareholders in each quarter of
2012, 2011 and 2010. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, we paid shareholder dividends
totaling $22.8 million, $23.1 million and $22.5 million, respectively. The Board
of Directors presently anticipates that it will declare a regular quarterly
dividend so long as the present tax treatment of dividends exists and adequate
levels of liquidity are maintained.
Dividends per Common Share
2012 2011 2010
First Quarter $ 0.09 $ 0.09 $ 0.09
Second Quarter $ 0.09 $ 0.09 $ 0.09
Third Quarter $ 0.09 $ 0.09 $ 0.09
Fourth Quarter $ 0.09 $ 0.09 $ 0.09
Stock Repurchase Program
Since 1997, our Board of Directors has approved multiple share repurchase
programs that have authorized open market repurchase transactions of up to
35 million shares of our common stock. For the years 2012, 2011 and 2010, we
repurchased 1.8 million shares, 1.1 million shares and 0.7 million shares,
respectively, for a cost of $39.4 million, $35.6 million and $18.3 million,
respectively, at an average price of $22.03, $31.97 and $25.12 per share,
respectively. We currently have the authority to purchase an additional
4.1 million shares of our common stock under the current plan approved by the
Board of Directors.
Stock Option Exercises
To accommodate employee stock option exercises, we issued 0.4 million shares of
treasury stock for $6.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2012,
1.8 million shares of treasury stock for $34.1 million during the year ended
December 31, 2011, and 1.5 million shares of treasury stock for $24.9 million
during the year ended December 31, 2010.
39
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
We do not have off-balance sheet financing arrangements and have not engaged in
any related party transactions or arrangements with unconsolidated entities or
other persons that are reasonably likely to materially affect liquidity or the
availability of or requirements for capital resources.
We have various contractual obligations and commercial commitments. The
following table sets forth, in millions, the annual payments we are required to
make under contractual cash obligations and other commercial commitments at
December 31, 2012.
Contractual Obligations
(In millions) Total 2013 2014 2015 2016 After 2016
Long-term debt $ 46.5 $ 0.5 $ - $ - $ - $ 46.0
Interest on long-term debt 16.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 7.1
Purchase obligations 53.3 52.4 0.9 - - -
Operating lease obligations 16.3 4.4 3.7 3.2 2.3 2.7
Totals $ 132.4 $ 59.6 $ 6.9 $ 5.5 $ 4.6 $ 55.8
We are required to make payments necessary to pay the interest on the Taxable
Revenue Bond, Series 1995, as amended, currently outstanding in the aggregate
principal amount of $46.5 million. The bond matures on January 1, 2020, and
bears interest at the rate of 5% per annum. Included in long-term investments
are $48.3 million of restricted funds, which is a collateral deposit against the
principal amount of this bond. Due to continued positive cash flow from
operating activities, we made a business decision in 2006 to begin an early
partial redemption of the Bond. We made principal payments of $0.5 million and
$1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. It is
our intent to make annual principal payments in addition to the interest amounts
that are due. In connection with this decision, $0.5 million of the bond debt
has been reclassified to a current liability in accounts payable in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012. See Note 8 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
We have committed to invest up to an aggregate of $7.9 million in two private
equity funds, and we have contributed $8.4 million as of December 31, 2012, of
which $7.7 million has been applied to these commitments. The additional $0.2
million commitment has been excluded from the table above due to uncertainty of
when it will be applied.
We also have obligations related to uncertain income tax positions that have
been excluded from the table above due to the uncertainty of when the related
expense will be recognized. See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information.
Effect of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
During 2012, we adopted the following accounting standards, which had no
material effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial
condition:
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU
2011-05). ASU 2011-05 requires companies to present the components of net income
and other comprehensive income either as one continuous statement or as two
consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the
components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in
stockholders' equity. While ASU 2011-05 changes the presentation of
comprehensive income, it does not change the components that are recognized in
net income or comprehensive income under current accounting guidance. This
update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years,
ending after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We adopted this
amendment during the first quarter of 2012, and we have provided the revised
financial statement presentation required for the period ended December 31,
2012.
In December 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12,
Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of
Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in
Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 (ASU 2011-12). ASU 2011-12 defers the
effective date for certain presentation requirements that relate to
reclassification adjustments and the effect of those reclassification
adjustments on the financial statements. This update is effective for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those years, ending after December 15, 2011,
with early adoption permitted. We adopted this amendment during the first
quarter of 2012. The adoption of this amendment had no effect on our
consolidated results of operations and financial condition for the period ended
December 31, 2012.
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Amendments
to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S.
GAAP and IFRSs (ASU 2011-04). ASU 2011-04 is intended to improve the
comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial
statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The amendments are of
two types: (i) those that clarify the Board's intent about the application of
existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements and (ii) those that
change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for
disclosing information about fair value measurements. This update is effective
for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted this amendment
during the first quarter of 2012, and we have provided the disclosures required
for the period ended December 31, 2012.
40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02,
Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
(ASU 2013-02). ASU 2013-02 requires entities to provide information about the
amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component
either on the face of the financial statements or in the footnotes. ASU 2013-02
does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other
comprehensive income in the financial statements. This update is effective
prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. We do not
expect the adoption of this amendment will have an effect on our consolidated
results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Subsequent Events
On January 15, 2013, the Board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.09 per
common share to be paid to shareholders of record at the close of business on
February 7, 2013. The quarterly dividend payment was $5.6 million and was paid
on February 21, 2013.
As of February 28, 2013, we have repurchased 0.9 million shares of our common
stock through open market purchases at an average cost of $22.45 per share. We
currently have the authority to purchase an additional 3.2 million shares of our
common stock under the current plan approved by the Board of Directors.
[ Back To Technology News's Homepage ]
|