Appeals court guts 'net neutrality'
(UPI Top Stories Via Acquire Media NewsEdge) A U.S. appeals court panel in Washington Tuesday struck down the core of the Obama administration's regulations to ensure "net neutrality."
The panel left intact the regulations' disclosure requirements -- designed to show Internet entities are being treated fairly -- but threw out the anti-discrimination and anti-blocking rules, designed to actually ensure fair treatment of Internet entities.
The regulations were promulgated in 2010 by the Federal Communications Commission. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit hears challenges to agency regulations, in this case brought by Verizon.
A densely written 63-page opinion by U.S. Circuit Judge David Tatel said broadband providers are not strictly "common carriers" under federal telecommunications law, which was used to underpin the regulations.
"Given that the commission has chosen to classify broadband providers in a manner that exempts them from treatment as common carriers, the Communications Act expressly prohibits the commission from nonetheless regulating them as such," Tatel said.
"Because the commission has failed to establish that the anti-discrimination and anti-blocking rules do not impose per se common carrier obligations, we vacate those portions of the Open Internet Order."
In part, the regulations were designed to ensure "edge providers," such as Amazon, Google, Netflix or YouTube, are treated equally and fairly by broadband providers, who might be tempted to prioritize access to harm potential rivals.
There was no immediate word on whether the FCC will ask the entire U.S. court of appeals to rehear the case, or ask the U.S. Supreme Court for review.
Copyright 2014 United Press International, Inc. (UPI). Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI's prior written consent.
[ Back To Technology News's Homepage ]