SUBSCRIBE TO TMCnet
TMCnet - World's Largest Communications and Technology Community

TMCNet:  GENERAL CABLE CORP /DE/ - 10-K - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

[March 03, 2014]

GENERAL CABLE CORP /DE/ - 10-K - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Edgar Glimpses Via Acquire Media NewsEdge) The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") is intended to help the reader understand General Cable Corporation's financial position, changes in financial condition, and results of operations. MD&A is provided as a supplement to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ("Footnote" or "Notes") and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes.


24-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents Certain statements in this report including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial results and performance, plans and objectives, capital expenditures and the Company's or management's beliefs, expectations or opinions, are forward-looking statements, and as such, General Cable desires to take advantage of the "safe harbor" which is afforded such statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company's forward-looking statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's comments in this report under the heading, "Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements." Actual results may differ materially from those statements as a result of factors, risks and uncertainties over which the Company has no control. For a list of these factors, risks and uncertainties, refer to Item 1A - Risk Factors.

Overview The Company is a global leader in the development, design, manufacture, marketing and distribution of copper, aluminum and fiber optic wire and cable products for use in the energy, industrial, construction, specialty and communications markets. The Company additionally engages in the design, integration, and installation on a turn-key basis for products such as high and extra-high voltage terrestrial and submarine systems. The Company analyzes its worldwide operations based on three geographical segments: North America, Europe and Mediterranean, and ROW. As of December 31, 2013, the Company manufactures its product lines in 56 manufacturing facilities and sells its products worldwide through its global operations. The Company believes it has a strong market position in each of the segments in which it competes due to the Company's guiding principles discussed in Item 1 - Business.

Significant Current Business Trends and Events The wire and cable industry is competitive, mature and cost driven with minimal differentiation for many product offerings among industry participants from a manufacturing or technology standpoint. Over the last several years, the Company and the industry have experienced stabilizing demand with pockets of relative demand strength. However, global demand remains below historical levels in many markets. The following are significant trends and events that occurred in 2013: The Company continued and expects to continue to see volatile commodity pricing, primarily copper and aluminum, as well as in other cost inputs. The Company typically passes these changes in copper and aluminum prices along to its customers, although there are timing delays of varying lengths depending upon the volatility of metal prices, the type of product, competitive conditions, pricing mechanisms and particular customer arrangements. Although the general trends are detailed in Item 1 - Business - Raw Materials, there is no exact measure of the effect of the change of raw material cost inputs due to the high volume of transactions in any given period, each of which involves a number of factors in the individual pricing decisions. To help reduce this volatility, the Company has implemented various pricing mechanisms and hedges a portion of its metal purchases when there is a firm price commitment for a future delivery but does not engage in speculative metals trading.

On December 10, 2013, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the extension of the Company's existing $125 million share repurchase through the end of 2014.

Stock purchases under this program may be made through the open market and privately negotiated transactions at times and in such amounts as deemed appropriate by a special committee appointed by the Board. Under the stock repurchase program, the Company purchased $19.5 million, or 597,531 common shares at an average price of $32.65 per share, during the year ended December 31, 2013. Under the prior stock repurchase program, the Company purchased $1.2 million, or 50,000 common shares at an average price of $24.80 per share, during the year ended December 31, 2012. The purpose of the share repurchase program is to take advantage of the investment opportunity given prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as well as our evaluation of other capital investment alternatives.

On May 20, 2013, the Company's Board of Directors authorized and initiated the payment of a regular quarterly dividend of $0.18 per quarter. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company paid in total approximately $26.7 million to all common shareholders of record, or $0.54 per share. Future declarations of dividends and the establishment of future record dates and payment dates are subject to the final determination by our Board of Directors.

On July 21, 2011, the Company entered into a $400 million Revolving Credit Facility, which was first amended in 2012 to increase the Facility size to $700 million and then subsequently amended and restated on September 6, 2013, to, among other things, increase the Revolving Credit Facility to $1.0 billion, $630 million of which may be borrowed by the U.S. borrower, $300 million of which may be borrowed by the European borrowers and $70 million of which may be borrowed by the Canadian borrower. The Revolving Credit Facility contains restrictions including limitations on, among other things, distributions and dividends, acquisitions and investments, indebtedness, liens and affiliate transactions.

The Revolving Credit Facility provides the Company with financial flexibility; restrictions in the Revolving Credit Facility generally only apply in the event that the Company's availability under the Revolving Credit Facility falls below certain specific thresholds.

In the second half of 2013, the Company's executive management decided to no longer import building wire product into the United States manufactured in its Mexico unit ("Mexico"). This change is considered significant to the Mexican operation due to the associated revenue, profit and the influence on the overall results in Mexico from this United States business. This change coupled with pricing pressures in the Mexico market and a history of losses caused the Company to perform an asset impairment 25-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents analysis of its Mexican business in accordance with ASC 360 "Property, Plant and Equipment". Based on the results of the analysis, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $14.0 million in the third quarter of 2013.

In 2013, the Company continued to actively identify key trends in the industry to capitalize on expanding markets and new niche markets. The Company also sets aggressive performance targets for its business and intends to refocus or divest those activities which fail to meet targets or do not fit long-term strategies.

No material acquisitions were made in the year ended December 31, 2013. In 2012, the Company acquired the North American and Chinese businesses of Alcan Cable, Prestolite Wire, LLC and 60% of Productora de Cables Procables S.A.S. See Note 3 - Acquisitions and Divestitures for further detail. The results of operations of the acquired businesses have been included in the Consolidated Financial Statements since the respective dates of the acquisitions. No material divestitures were made in the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. In February 2014 the Company announced the permanent closure of two electric utility plants in North America with annual savings anticipated to be in the range of $3 to $5 million and one-time charges in the range of $10 to $12 million, half of which are expected to be non-cash.

In addition to the factors previously mentioned, the Company is currently being affected by the following general macro-level trends: • Currency volatility and continued political uncertainty in certain markets; • Competitive price pressures in certain markets; • New commodity deposits are more difficult to find, harder and more expensive to extract, and lower in quantities; • Recovery is slowly advancing in Europe and demand continues to be uneven for a broad spectrum of products in Europe; • New communications networks are an enabling technology, resulting in access to knowledge; a great equalizer; • Climate change concerns are resulting in increased regulatory energy mandates, emphasizing renewable sources of energy; • Project timing continues to be volatile resulting in a lag in demand in all segments; • Countries are seeking greater energy independence for political and economic reasons; and • Markets in the U.S. and Canada have remained relatively stable compared to the uneven and challenging operating environments of the emerging economies.

The Company's overall financial results discussed in this section of the annual report reflect the above trends.

26-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents Results of Operations The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, consolidated statement of operations data in millions of dollars and as a percentage of net sales. Percentages may not add due to rounding.

Year Ended December 31, 2013 2012 2011 Amount % Amount % Amount % Net sales $ 6,421.2 100.0 % $ 6,059.5 100.0 % $ 5,808.2 100.0 % Cost of sales 5,717.5 89.0 % 5,434.6 89.7 % 5,213.9 89.8 % Gross profit 703.7 11.0 % 624.9 10.3 % 594.3 10.2 % Selling, general and administrative expenses 492.0 7.7 % 425.5 7.0 % 379.7 6.5 % Operating income 211.7 3.3 % 199.4 3.3 % 214.6 3.7 % Other income (expense) (66.7 ) (1.0 )% (2.9 ) - % (31.7 ) (0.5 )% Interest expense, net, and loss on extinguishment of debt (118.0 ) (1.8 )% (109.6 ) (1.8 )% (91.5 ) (1.6 )% Income before income taxes 27.0 0.4 % 86.9 1.4 % 91.4 1.6 % Income tax provision (38.8 ) (0.6 )% (78.6 ) (1.3 )% (38.6 ) (0.7 )% Equity in net earnings of affiliated companies 1.7 - 1.7 - 2.9 - % Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest (10.1 ) (0.2 )% 10.0 0.2 % 55.7 1.0 % Less: preferred stock dividends 0.3 - 0.3 - 0.3 - Less: net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest 7.7 0.1 % 5.7 0.1 0.9 - % Net income (loss) attributable to Company common shareholders $ (18.1 ) (0.3 )% $ 4.0 0.1 % $ 54.5 0.9 % Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2012 Net Sales The following tables set forth net sales, metal-adjusted net sales and metal pounds sold by segment, in millions. For the metal-adjusted net sales results, net sales for 2012 have been adjusted to reflect the 2013 copper average price of $3.34 per pound (a $0.28 decrease compared to 2012) and the aluminum average price of $0.95 per pound (a $0.07 decrease compared to 2012). Metal-adjusted net sales, a non-GAAP financial measure, are provided herein in order to eliminate the effect of metal price volatility from the comparison of revenues from one period to another. The comparable GAAP financial measure is set forth below.

Refer to Item 1 - Business- Significant Current Business Trends and Events for a discussion of metal price volatility.

Net Sales Year Ended Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Amount % Amount % North America $ 2,751.6 43 % $ 2,340.2 39 % Europe and Mediterranean 1,629.6 25 % 1,684.2 28 % ROW 2,040.0 32 % 2,035.1 33 % Total net sales $ 6,421.2 100 % $ 6,059.5 100 % 27-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents Metal-Adjusted Net Sales Year Ended Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Amount % Amount % North America $ 2,751.6 43 % $ 2,266.0 39 % Europe and Mediterranean 1,629.6 25 % 1,631.8 28 % ROW 2,040.0 32 % 1,946.0 33 % Total metal-adjusted net sales $ 6,421.2 100 % $ 5,843.8 100 % Metal adjustment - 215.7 Total net sales $ 6,421.2 $ 6,059.5 Metal Pounds Sold Year Ended Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Pounds % Pounds % North America 590.0 45 % 432.1 38 %Europe and Mediterranean 272.2 21 % 282.0 24 % ROW 450.8 34 % 434.1 38 % Total metal pounds sold 1,313.0 100 % 1,148.2 100 % Net sales increased $361.7 million, or 6%, to $6,421.2 million in 2013 from 2012 and metal-adjusted net sales increased $577.4 million, or 10%, in 2013 from 2012. The increase in metal-adjusted net sales of $577.4 million reflects an increase in net sales of $684.1 million attributable to acquisitions made in 2012 and favorable selling price and product mix of $116.2 million partially offset by lower sales volume of $116.1 million and unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate changes of $106.8 million. Volume, as measured by metal pounds sold, increased by 164.8 million pounds, or 14%, in 2013 compared to 2012. Metal pounds sold is provided herein as the Company believes this metric to be a consistent year over year measure of sales volume since it is not impacted by metal prices or foreign currency exchange rate changes.

Metal-adjusted net sales in the North America segment increased $485.6 million, or 21%, principally due to net sales of $491.8 million attributable to acquisitions made in 2012 and favorable selling price and product mix of $28.4 million partially offset by lower sales volumes of $25.2 million and unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate changes of $9.4 million, principally related to the Canadian dollar. Volume, as measured by metal pounds sold, increased by 157.9 million pounds, or 37%, in 2013 compared to 2012. The increase in volume is primarily attributable to 168.7 million pounds sold related to acquisitions made in 2012 partially offset by a decline in sales of the Company's legacy utility cables business due to strong demand for utility cables in the first half of 2012, which benefited from a relatively mild winter and wind farm applications.

Metal-adjusted net sales in the Europe and Mediterranean segment remained relatively flat in 2013 compared to 2012 due to unfavorable selling price and product mix of $22.9 million and lower sales volumes of $22.9 million partially offset by favorable foreign currency exchange rate changes of $43.6 million, primarily due to a stronger Euro relative to the U.S. dollar. Volume, as measured by metal pounds sold, decreased by 9.8 million pounds, or 3%, in 2013 compared to 2012. The decrease in demand was primarily attributable to continued weak economic conditions in Iberia, which negatively influenced demand across a broad spectrum of products and due to a decrease in demand for high voltage export project activities in the Company's French business.

Metal-adjusted net sales in the ROW segment increased $94.0 million, or 5%, due to favorable selling price and product mix of $110.7 million and net sales of $192.3 million attributable to acquisitions made in 2012 partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate changes of $141.0 million, primarily due to the weakening of certain currencies in Central and South America relative to the U.S. dollar, and lower sales volume of $68.0 million. Volume, as measured by metal pounds sold, increased by 16.7 million pounds, or 4%, in 2013 compared to 2012. The increase in volume is primarily attributable to 45.8 million pounds related to the impact of the acquisitions made in 2012 partially offset by lower shipments for metal intensive Brazilian aerial transmission projects in 2013 as compared to 2012.

Cost of Sales Cost of sales increased $282.9 million, or 5%, from 2012, principally due to higher sales volumes associated with acquisitions made in the second half of 2012. The increase is partially offset by lower average copper and aluminum costs in 2013. As previously noted, cost of sales is raw material intensive with copper and aluminum comprising the major cost components in most of the Company's cable products. At current metal prices, material costs are approximately 85% of total product costs with copper and aluminum metal costs comprising approximately 55% of total product cost for the year ended December 31, 2013.

28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents Gross Profit Gross profit increased $78.8 million, or 13% in 2013 as compared to 2012. Gross profit as a percentage of sales was 11% in 2013 and 10% in 2012. The increase is primarily due to the acquisitions completed in the second half of 2012 partially offset by the recognition of a non-cash impairment charge related to the Mexico long-lived assets of $14.0 million in 2013. In addition, gross profit in the fourth quarter of 2012 was significantly impacted by changes in cost estimates relating to certain submarine turnkey projects in the European segment. In total, the changes in estimates across all submarine turnkey projects resulted in a reduction to gross profit of $27.5 million, with $20.8 million of the reduction associated with one specific project at the Company's German submarine power cable manufacturing facility. Equipment failure at the German facility resulted in costs, for this particular project, related to cable damage, equipment repairs and ship rental of $13.3 million. Further revision of this project's profitability, due to changes in estimates, resulted in a reduction of margin by $7.5 million. There was no material impact to gross profit as a result of changes in estimates related to revenue recognition under the percentage of completion method in 2013.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense Selling, general and administrative expense increased $66.5 million, or 16%, in 2013 from 2012. The increase in selling, general, and administrative expense is primarily a result of additional expenses associated with the acquired businesses in the second half of 2012 and $13.9 million of costs related to the restatement and investigative costs recognized in 2013 as compared to $3.0 million in 2012. The increase is partially offset by a settlement loss of $6.1 million in 2012 associated with the termination of a legacy pension plan in the United Kingdom.

Operating Income The following table sets forth operating income by segment, in millions of dollars.

Operating Income (Loss) Year Ended Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Amount % Amount % North America $ 129.8 61 % $ 126.1 63 %Europe and Mediterranean (0.3 ) - % (13.0 ) (6 )% ROW 82.2 39 % 86.3 43 % Total operating income $ 211.7 100 % $ 199.4 100 % The increase in operating income for the North America segment of $3.7 million was primarily attributable to the acquisitions completed in the second half of 2012 resulting in an additional $33.9 million of operating income in 2013 as compared to 2012 partially offset by the decrease in demand as noted above as well as $13.9 million of costs related to the financial restatement in 2013 as compared to $3.0 million in 2012.

The reduction in operating loss for the Europe and Mediterranean segment of $12.7 million was primarily attributable to changes in cost estimates relating to certain submarine turnkey projects of $27.5 million recognized in 2012. This improvement in 2013 was partially offset by decreased volume at the Company's French manufacturing facility as noted above, an unfavorable pricing environment for medium voltage products in France as well as the continued weak economic conditions in Iberia, influencing demand and the pricing environment across a broad spectrum of products.

The decrease in operating income for the ROW segment of $4.1 million was primarily attributable to the recognition of a non-cash impairment charge related to the Mexico long-lived assets of $14.0 million in 2013 as well as decreased demand in Brazil in 2013 as compared to 2012 as noted above. The decrease was partially offset by acquisitions completed in the second half of 2012 resulting in an additional $11.4 million of operating income in 2013 as compared to 2012.

Other Income (Expense) Other income (expense) primarily includes foreign currency transaction gains or losses, which result from changes in exchange rates between the designated functional currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated as well as gains and losses on derivative instruments that are not designated as cash flow hedges. During 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded a $66.7 million loss and a $2.9 million loss, respectively. For 2013, other expense was primarily attributable to $40.9 million related to a Venezuela currency devaluation, $3.9 million of foreign currency transaction losses which resulted from changes in exchange rates in the various regions in which the Company operates which include $17.0 million in foreign exchange gains related to copper imports in Venezuela that were approved at the 4.30 BsF per U.S. dollar rate prior to currency devaluation on February 13, 2013, and losses of $21.9 million on derivative instruments which were not designated as cash flow hedges and ineffectiveness on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. For 2012, other expense was primarily attributable to $4.5 million of foreign currency transaction losses which resulted from changes in exchange rates in the various countries in which the Company operates 29-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents and gains of $1.6 million on derivative instruments that were not designated as cash flow hedges and ineffectiveness on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges.

Interest Expense Net interest expense increased $17.7 million in 2013 as compared to 2012 primarily attributable to the incremental interest related to the $600.0 million 5.75% Senior Notes issued on September 25, 2012 net of the $200.0 million of 7.125% Senior Notes due 2017 which were repaid on October 12, 2012.

Tax Provision The Company's effective tax rate for 2013 and 2012 was 143.7% and 90.4%, respectively. The increase in the Company's 2013 effective tax rate reflects the combined impact of the significant valuation allowances recorded against the deferred tax assets of various units with a recent loss history and the lower consolidated pre-tax income relative to 2012. The Company's 2012 effective tax rate reflects the adverse impact of significant valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets, as explained further below, and nonrecurring tax charges incurred in connection with legal entity restructuring to integrate the Alcan acquisition.

In the third quarter of 2012, the Company updated its 2012 forecasts and substantially completed its 2013 global business planning process, which indicated continuing weakness in its Iberian market and business. After weighing all positive and negative evidence, including the three year cumulative loss position, and factoring in prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, management judged that it was not more likely than not that a future tax benefit for the deferred tax assets of its Spanish and Portuguese business units would be realized. Tax expense of $15 million was recorded in 2012 to establish a full valuation allowance against Spanish and Portuguese deferred tax assets, of which $5.3 million related to the beginning of the year net deferred tax asset position.

In the fourth quarter of 2012, a valuation allowance was also recorded against deferred tax assets in the Company's German business unit. The German business unit incurred an equipment failure in the fourth quarter that adversely impacted its ability to meet its contractual obligations for its large project work and reduced profit expectations. In addition, the German business was encountering certain other project delay/cancellation and warranty issues. After weighing all positive and negative evidence, including the three year cumulative loss position, and factoring in prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, management judged that it was not more likely than not that a future tax benefit for the deferred tax assets of its German business would be realized. Tax expense of $8.3 million was recorded in 2012 to establish a full valuation allowance against German deferred tax assets, none of which related to a beginning of the year net deferred tax asset position.

A full valuation allowance was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012 for the Company's Colombian distribution business since it was rendered redundant by the fourth quarter acquisition of Procables. The Colombian distribution business is winding down and is expected to generate losses until the business is terminated. Tax expense of $1.1 million was recorded in 2012 to establish a full valuation allowance against the Colombian deferred tax assets, of which $0.2 million related to the beginning of the year net deferred tax asset position.

Preferred Stock Dividends During 2013 and 2012, the Company accrued and paid $0.3 million in dividends on its Series A preferred stock.

The Company issued 2,070,000 shares of General Cable 5.75% Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series A preferred stock") on November 24, 2003.

Zero shares and 76,002 were outstanding under the original terms of the Series A preferred stock issuance as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company's outstanding shares of the Series A preferred stock were to be mandatorily redeemed on November 24, 2013. Prior to the redemption date, all but two shareholders elected to convert their shares into shares of the Company's common stock at the conversion ratio of 5.056 shares of common stock per share of Series A preferred stock. As a result of the conversions and mandatory redemption, as of November 25, 2013, no shares of the Series A preferred stock were outstanding.

Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2011 Net Sales The following tables set forth net sales, metal-adjusted net sales and metal pounds sold by segment, in millions. For the metal-adjusted net sales results, net sales for 2011 have been adjusted to reflect the 2012 copper average price of $3.62 per pound (a $0.39 decrease compared to the prior period) and the aluminum average price of $1.02 per pound (a $0.14 decrease compared to the prior period). Metal-adjusted net sales, a non-GAAP financial measure, are provided herein in order to eliminate the effect of metal price volatility from the comparison of revenues from one period to another. The comparable GAAP financial measure is set forth below. Refer to Item 1 - Business for a discussion of metal price volatility.

30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents Net Sales Year Ended Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Amount % Amount % North America $ 2,340.2 39 % $ 2,120.2 36 % Europe and Mediterranean 1,684.2 28 % 1,737.9 30 % ROW 2,035.1 33 % 1,950.1 34 % Total net sales $ 6,059.5 100 % $ 5,808.2 100 % Metal-Adjusted Net Sales Year Ended Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Amount % Amount % North America $ 2,340.2 39 % $ 2,023.8 37 % Europe and Mediterranean 1,684.2 28 % 1,657.0 30 % ROW 2,035.1 33 % 1,831.5 33 % Total metal-adjusted net sales $ 6,059.5 100 % $ 5,512.3 100 % Metal adjustment - 295.9 Total net sales $ 6,059.5 $ 5,808.2 Metal Pounds Sold Year Ended Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Pounds % Pounds % North America 432.1 38 % 317.4 33 %Europe and Mediterranean 282.0 24 % 273.8 28 % ROW 434.1 38 % 384.6 39 % Total metal pounds sold 1,148.2 100 % 975.8 100 % Net sales increased $251.3 million, or 4%, to $6,059.5 million in 2012 from 2011 and metal-adjusted net sales increased $547.2 million, or 10%, in 2012 from 2011. The increase in metal-adjusted net sales of $547.2 million reflects favorable selling price and product mix of $294.2 million, net sales of $268.8 million attributable to acquisitions, and higher sales volume of $190.9 million partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate changes of $206.7 million. Volume, as measured by metal pounds sold, increased by 172.4 million pounds, or 18%, in 2012 compared to 2011. Metal pounds sold is provided herein as the Company believes this metric to be a consistent year over year measure of sales volume since it is not impacted by metal prices or foreign currency exchange rate changes.

Metal-adjusted net sales in the North America segment increased $316.4 million, or 16%, principally due to net sales of $229.0 million attributable to acquisitions, higher sales volumes of $64.5 million and favorable selling price and product mix of $25.9 million partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate changes of $3.0 million, principally related to the Canadian dollar. Volume, as measured by metal pounds sold, increased by 114.7 million pounds, or 36%, in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase in volume is primarily attributable to the acquisitions executed in 2012. In addition to the acquisitions made in 2012, volume improvement principally reflects increased demand for bare aluminum transmission products and specialty cables, particularly those used in natural resource extraction and transit applications.

Metal-adjusted net sales in the Europe and Mediterranean segment increased $27.2 million, or 2%, in 2012 compared to 2011 due to favorable selling price and product mix of $133.6 million and higher sales volumes of $21.7 million partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate changes of $128.1 million, primarily due to a weaker Euro relative to the U.S. dollar. Volume, as measured by metal pounds sold, increased by 8.2 million pounds, or 3%, in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase in volume is primarily attributable to the demand for utility products in France and increased exports from our Spanish facilities.

Metal-adjusted net sales in the ROW segment increased $203.6 million, or 11%, due to favorable selling price and product mix of $134.0 million, higher sales volume of $105.4 million and net sales of $39.8 million attributable to acquisitions partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate changes of $75.6 million, primarily due to the weakening of certain currencies in Central and South America relative to the U.S. dollar. Volume, as measured by metal pounds sold, increased by 49.5 million pounds, or 13%, in 2012 compared to 2011, which includes the benefit of 9.7 million pounds due to acquisitions. The increase in demand is primarily due to aerial transmission product shipments in Brazil.

31-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents Cost of Sales Cost of sales increased $220.7 million, or 4%, from 2011, principally due to higher sales volumes associated with acquisitions executed in 2012. The increase in volume is offset by lower average copper and aluminum costs in 2012. As previously noted, cost of sales is raw material intensive with copper and aluminum comprising the major cost components for most of the Company's cable products. At current metal prices, material costs are approximately 85% of total product costs with copper and aluminum metal costs comprising approximately 55% of total product cost for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Gross Profit Gross profit increased $30.6 million, or 5% in 2012 as compared to 2011. Gross profit as a percentage of sales was 10% in 2012 and 2011. Gross profit in the fourth quarter of 2012 was significantly impacted by changes in cost estimates relating to certain submarine turnkey projects in the European segment. In total, the changes in estimates across all submarine turnkey projects resulted in a reduction to gross profit of $27.5 million, with $20.8 million of the reduction associated with one certain submarine turnkey project at the Company's German submarine power cable manufacturing facility. Equipment failure at the German facility resulted in costs, for this particular project, related to cable damage, equipment repairs and ship rental of $13.3 million. Further revision of this project's profitability, due to changes in estimates, resulted in a reduction of margin by $7.5 million. The project is approximately 40% complete as of December 31, 2012. There was no material impact to gross profit as a result of changes in estimates related to revenue recognition under the percentage of completion method in 2011 or 2010.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense Selling, general and administrative expense increased $45.8 million, or 12%, in 2012 from 2011. The increase in selling, general, and administrative expense is primarily a result of $22.0 million in additional expenses associated with acquired businesses in 2012 and $9.1 million of costs related to the 2012 acquisitions and restatements. In addition, SG&A increased due to a settlement loss of $6.1 million in 2012 associated with the termination of a legacy pension plan in the United Kingdom.

Operating Income The following table sets forth operating income by segment, in millions of dollars.

Operating Income (Loss) Year Ended Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Amount % Amount % North America $ 126.1 63 % $ 121.8 57 %Europe and Mediterranean (13.0 ) (6 )% 30.3 14 % ROW 86.3 43 % 62.5 29 % Total operating income $ 199.4 100 % $ 214.6 100 % The increase in operating income for the North America segment of $4.3 million was primarily attributable to increases in sales volume due to acquisitions executed in 2012, favorable market demand for bare aluminum transmission products related to aerial transmission grid projects as well as increased volume due to specialty cables. The increases to operating income were partially offset by an increase in SG&A expense for costs related to the acquisitions and to the restatements of $9.1 million in 2012.

The decrease in operating income for the Europe and Mediterranean segment of $43.3 million was primarily attributable to changes in cost estimates relating to certain submarine turnkey projects of $27.5 million and continued weak demand and pricing due to the economic slowdown in many European end markets. Partially offsetting these negative impacts were the current year benefits of European targeted cost reduction efforts, which include, among other actions, personnel reductions.

The increase in operating income for the ROW segment of $23.8 million was primarily attributable to strong spending in Venezuela for government led projects, increased demand and operational improvements in Thailand, increased sales in Brazil, principally related to aerial transmission projects.

Other Income (Expense) Other income (expense) primarily includes foreign currency transaction gains or losses, which result from changes in exchange rates between the designated functional currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated as well as gains and losses on derivative instruments that are not designated as cash flow hedges. During 2012 and 2011 the Company recorded a $2.9 million loss and a $31.7 million loss, respectively. For 2012, other expense was primarily attributable to $4.5 million of foreign currency transaction losses which resulted from changes in exchange rates in the various countries in which the Company operates, and $1.6 million of gains on derivative instruments which were not designated as cash flow hedges and ineffectiveness on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. For 2011, other expense was primarily attributable to $24.4 million of foreign currency transaction 32-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents losses which resulted from changes in exchange rates in the various countries in which the Company operates, and $6.1 million of losses on derivative instruments which were not designated as cash flow hedges.

Interest Expense Net interest expense increased $18.1 million in 2012. Interest expense increased primarily due to fees and redemption premiums of $9.3 million associated with the call of the $200 million of the 7.125% Senior Notes. Additionally, interest expense increased due to the addition of the $600.0 million senior unsecured notes (the "5.75% Senior Notes"), issued on September 25, 2012.

Tax Provision The Company's effective tax rate for 2012 and 2011 was 90.4% and 42.2%, respectively. The increase in the Company's 2012 effective tax rate reflects the adverse impact of significant valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets, as explained further below, and nonrecurring tax charges incurred in connection with legal entity restructuring to integrate the Alcan acquisition.

The Company's 2011 effective tax rate reflects the adverse impact of valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets in certain foreign jurisdictions, partially offset by tax benefits recognized for uncertain tax positions due to statute of limitations expirations and tax audit settlements.

In the third quarter of 2012, the Company updated its 2012 forecasts and substantially completed its 2013 global business planning process, which indicated continuing weakness in its Iberian market and business. After weighing all positive and negative evidence, including the three year cumulative loss position, and factoring in prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, management judged that it was not more likely than not that a future tax benefit for the deferred tax assets of its Spanish and Portuguese business units would be realized. Tax expense of $15 million was recorded in 2012 to establish a full valuation allowance against Spanish and Portuguese deferred tax assets, of which $5.3 million related to the beginning of the year net deferred tax asset position.

In the fourth quarter of 2012, a valuation allowance was also recorded against deferred tax assets in the Company's German business unit. The German business unit incurred an equipment failure in the fourth quarter that adversely impacted its ability to meet its contractual obligations for its large project work and reduced profit expectations. In addition, the German business was encountering certain other project delay/cancellation and warranty issues. After weighing all positive and negative evidence, including the three year cumulative loss position, and factoring in prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, management judged that it was not more likely than not that a future tax benefit for the deferred tax assets of its German business would be realized. Tax expense of $8.3 million was recorded in 2012 to establish a full valuation allowance against German deferred tax assets, none of which related to a beginning of the year net deferred tax asset position.

A full valuation allowance was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012 for the Company's Colombian distribution business since it was rendered redundant by the fourth quarter acquisition of Procables. The Colombian distribution business is winding down and is expected to generate losses until the business is terminated. Tax expense of $1.1 million was recorded in 2012 to establish a full valuation allowance against the Colombian deferred tax assets, of which $0.2 million related to the beginning of the year net deferred tax asset position.

Preferred Stock Dividends During 2012 and 2011, the Company accrued and paid $0.3 million in dividends on its Series A preferred stock.

Liquidity and Capital Resources The Company maintains a strong financial position as evidenced by the Company's ability to generate substantial cash from operations and access to capital markets at competitive rates. Cash flows from operations as well as borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility provide the primary source for financing operating expenses and other short term liquidity needs. As necessary the Company may supplement additional debt to fund other working capital needs, debt and interest payments, as well as discretionary investment in internal product development, acquisitions, cash dividends, repurchase of common stock and to fund tax payments. The overall cash position of the Company reflects the business results and a global cash management strategy that incorporates liquidity management, economic factors, and tax considerations.

The Company's short term borrowings vary by period based on the Company's working capital requirements which is dependent on incremental demand for products and changes in the price of copper, aluminum, and other raw material cost inputs. At December 31, 2013, current assets exceeded current liabilities by $1,450.7 million. Based upon historical experience, the cash on its balance sheet and the expected availability of funds under its credit facilities, the Company believes its sources of liquidity will be sufficient to enable it to meet funding requirements for cash dividends, working capital, capital expenditures, debt repayment, salaries and related benefits, interest and taxes for the next twelve months and foreseeable future. The Company maintains approximately $650 million of excess availability under its various credit facilities around the world.

33-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents The Company's North American and principal European operations generally borrow and repay under our Revolving Credit Facility multiple times per week for working capital needs; borrowing on a short term basis is the most effective method to reduce interest costs based on the terms of the agreement. The Company's European operations also participate in accounts payable confirming arrangements with several European financial institutions to address working capital requirements in the business. The Company negotiates payment terms with suppliers of generally 180 days in Europe and submits invoices to the financial institutions with instructions for the financial institutions to transfer funds from European operations' accounts on the due date (on day 180) for the trade payables due. At December 31, 2013, the arrangements had a maximum availability limit of the equivalent of approximately $579.9 million, of which approximately $338.4 million was utilized. The Company's ROW operations utilize various short term credit facilities for working capital purposes.

General Cable Corporation is a holding company with no operations of its own.

All of the Company's operations are conducted, and net sales are generated, by its subsidiaries and investments. Accordingly, the Company's cash flow comes from the cash flows of its global operations. The Company's ability to use cash flow from its international operations, if necessary, has historically been adversely affected by limitations on the Company's ability to repatriate such earnings tax efficiently. As of December 31, 2013, approximately 99% of cash and cash equivalents were held outside of the U.S. by our foreign subsidiaries compared with 76% as of December 31, 2012. If these funds are needed for the Company's operations in the U.S., the Company would be required to accrue and pay U.S. taxes to repatriate these funds. However, the Company's intent is to permanently reinvest these funds outside of the U.S. and current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate them to fund U.S. operations. In addition, our Revolving Credit Facility provides the Company flexibility in financing operating expenses and any other short term liquidity needs of our North American and European operations.

Our operations in Venezuela are subject to foreign exchange and price controls which have historically limited the Company's ability to convert bolivars to U.S. dollars and transfer funds out of Venezuela. Approximately 46% and 23% of the consolidated cash balance as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, was held in Venezuela. The operating cash flows attributable to Venezuela were $97.4 million and $49.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company's overall operating cash flows of $38.2 million and $272.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively .

Summary of Cash Flows Operating cash inflow of $38.2 million in 2013 reflects a net working capital use of $179.6 million driven principally by an decrease in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities of $155.8 million. The decrease in accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities is due both to the implementation of the ABL facility in the Company's principal European operations which resulted in a reduction of payable balances including a more effective use of existing cash balances and an effort to more effectively utilize cash balances in certain ROW units to reduce outstanding accounts payable. Accounts receivable turnover remained consistent at 5.5 per annum turns in 2013 as compared to 5.4 turns per annum 2012. Inventory turnover remained consistent at 4.4 turns per annum in 2013 as compared to 4.3 turns per annum in 2012. More than offsetting the net working capital use of $179.6 million in the twelve fiscal months of 2013 was $217.8 million of overall net cash inflows related to net income (loss) adjusted for depreciation and amortization, amortization on restricted stock awards, foreign currency loss, non-cash asset impairment charge, deferred income tax income, excess tax deficiencies from stock based compensation, convertible debt instrument non cash interest charges, and the losses on the disposal of property.

Operating cash inflow of $272.6 million in 2012 reflects a net working capital source of $94.7 million driven principally by decreases in inventories and receivables of $105.9 million and $35.1 million, respectively. The decrease in inventory is primarily attributable to the impact of lower average metal prices during 2012 as compared to 2011. For the year ended December 31, 2012, copper prices averaged $3.62 per pound (a decrease of $0.39 per pound compared to the same period in 2011) and aluminum prices averaged $1.02 per pound (a decrease of $0.14 per pound as compared to the same period in 2011). Inventory turns remained consistent at 4.3 in 2012 and 4.4 in 2011. The decrease in accounts receivable is primarily attributable to the Company's continued focus on improvement by efficiently managing working capital. Days sales outstanding remained consistent year over year at approximately 70 days. In addition to the net working capital source of cash in the twelve fiscal months of 2012 was $177.9 million of overall net cash inflows related to net income adjusted for non-cash items included in net income (loss) such as depreciation and amortization, amortization on restricted stock awards, foreign currency loss, loss on extinguishment of debt, deferred income tax income, excess tax deficiencies from stock based compensation, convertible debt instrument non cash interest charges, and the loss on the disposal of property.

Operating cash inflow of $97.8 million in 2011 reflects a net working capital use of $110.2 million driven principally by increases in inventories and receivables of $180.1 million and $53.9 million, respectively, which were partially offset by increases in accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities of $126.8 million. The increase in accounts receivable primarily reflects the increase in selling prices due to the increase in raw material costs. Days sales outstanding has remained constant year over year at about 71 days. The increase in inventory is primarily due to the increase in metal prices throughout the year. Inventory turns increased to 34-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents 4.4 turns per year in 2011 as compared to 3.9 turns per year in 2010 due to the current year focus on reducing inventory levels by adjusting production. These cash outflows have been partially offset by increases in accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities which were primarily the result of incremental manufacturing activity due to an increase in demand and higher raw material cost inputs. More than offsetting this net working capital use of cash in the twelve fiscal months of 2011 was $208.0 million of overall net cash inflows related to net income adjusted for depreciation and amortization, amortization on restricted stock awards, foreign currency gains (losses), deferred income tax income, excess tax benefits from stock based compensation, convertible debt instrument non cash interest charges, and the gain on the disposal of property.

Cash flow used by investing activities was $94.6 million in 2013 principally reflecting capital expenditures of $89.1 million. The Company anticipates capital spending to be approximately $80 million to $100 million in 2014.

Financing activities were $122.4 million of cash outflows in 2013 as compared to cash inflows of $289.6 million in 2012. The decrease in cash flow of financing activities is due to the settlement of the $355 million 0.875% Convertible Notes and the initiation of a regular quarterly dividend of $0.18 per quarter in 2013.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company paid in total approximately $26.7 million to all common shareholders of record. Future declarations of dividends and the establishment of future record dates and payment dates are subject to the final determination of our Board of Directors. In determining dividends, the Board of Directors takes into consideration items such as general business conditions, financial performance, projected cash flows and anticipated financing needs. Future payments of dividends is also subject to the Company's Revolving Credit Facility, the indentures governing the Subordinated Convertible Notes, Senior Floating Rate Notes and 5.75% Senior Notes, and the requirements of Delaware general corporation law. In addition, the Company purchased $19.5 million, or 597,531 of its common shares at an average price of $32.65 per share, during the year ended December 31, 2013. The Company evaluates various factors such as future operating cash flow requirements, other cash flow expectations, investment and financing strategic plans and the overall cost of capital to determine the appropriate levels of short and long-term debt to maintain. Refer to "Debt and Other Contractual Obligations" below for details.

Debt and Other Contractual Obligations The Company had outstanding debt obligations of $1,386.9 million as of December 31, 2013 and maintained approximately $650 million of excess availability under its various credit facilities around the world. The Company utilizes short and long term debt to address working capital needs, debt repayments and interest as well as discretionary investments in internal product development, acquisitions, payment of dividends, repurchase of common stock and taxes. Short-term liquidity and working capital needs are generally supported through operating cash flows. The Company maintains ratings on its public debt; therefore, the Company has and expects to continue to obtain market rates on any new borrowings.

On September 25, 2012, the Company completed the issuance and sale of $600.0 million in aggregate principal amount of new senior unsecured notes (the "5.75% Senior Notes"). The 5.75% Senior Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed by each of the Company's current and future U.S. subsidiaries that is a borrower or a guarantor under the Company's Revolving Credit Facility or certain of the Company's or the guarantors' other indebtedness. The Company used the proceeds of the 5.75% Senior Notes to redeem all of its outstanding $200.0 million of 7.125% Senior Fixed Rate Notes that were to mature in April 2017. The Company used the balance of the proceeds for general corporate purposes, including repayment of borrowings under its Revolving Credit Facility.

On July 21, 2011, the Company entered into a $400 million Revolving Credit Facility, which was first amended in 2012 to increase the Facility size to $700 million and then subsequently amended and restated on September 6, 2013, to, among other things, increase the Revolving Credit Facility to $1.0 billion, $630 million of which may be borrowed by the U.S. borrower, $300 million of which may be borrowed by the European borrowers and $70 million of which may be borrowed by the Canadian borrower. The Revolving Credit Facility contains restrictions including limitations on, among other things, distributions and dividends, acquisitions and investments, indebtedness, liens and affiliate transactions.

The Revolving Credit Facility provides the Company with flexibility and the restrictions in the Revolving Credit Facility generally only apply in the event that the Company's availability under the Revolving Credit Facility falls below certain specific thresholds.

Failure to comply with any of the covenants, financial tests and ratios required by the Company's existing or future debt obligations could result in a default under those agreements and under other agreements containing cross-default provisions, as defined in the Company's Revolving Credit Facility, Subordinated Convertible Notes, Senior Floating Rate Notes, 5.75% Senior Notes and various other credit facilities maintained by the Company's restricted subsidiaries. A default would permit lenders to cease making further extensions of credit, accelerate the maturity of the debt under these agreements and foreclose upon any collateral securing that debt. Indebtedness under the Company's Revolving Credit Facility is secured by: (a) for US borrowings under the facility, a first priority security interest in substantially all of the Company's domestic assets and, (b) for Canadian and European borrowings under the facility, a first priority security interest in substantially all of the Company's domestic and Canadian assets and certain assets of our Spanish, French and German subsidiaries party to the facility. In addition, the lenders under the Company's Revolving Credit Facility have received a pledge of (i) 100% of the equity interests in substantially all of the Company's domestic subsidiaries, and (ii) 65% of the voting equity interests in and 100% of the non-voting equity interests in certain of the Company's foreign 35-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents subsidiaries, including the Company's Canadian subsidiaries and the Company's Spanish, French and German subsidiaries party to the facility. The Company also has incurred secured debt in connection with some of its European operations.

The lenders under these European secured credit facilities also have liens on assets of certain of our European subsidiaries. As a result of these pledges and liens, if the Company fails to meet its payment or other obligations under any of its secured indebtedness, the lenders under the applicable credit agreement would be entitled to foreclose on substantially all of the Company's assets and liquidate these assets. Broadly, cross-default provisions, would permit lenders to cause such indebtedness to become due prior to its stated maturity in the event a default is not cured for a period of time under the terms of one or more financing agreements, a change in control or a fundamental change.

As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all material debt covenants.

The Company's defined benefit plans at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were underfunded by $118.3 million and $163.7 million, respectively. The Company recorded an after-tax gain of $32.0 million in 2013 and an after-tax loss of $21.3 million in 2012 to accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company estimates its 2014 pension expense for its defined benefit pension plans will be approximately $14.9 million and cash contributions are expected to be approximately $13.2 million. In 2013, pension expense was $20.6 million and cash contributions were $11.2 million.

The Company anticipates being able to meet its obligations as they come due based on historical experience and the expected availability of funds under its credit facilities. The Company's contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2013 (in millions of dollars) are summarized below: Payments Due by Period Less than 1 - 3 4 - 5 After 5 Contractual obligations (1,2): Total 1 Year Years Years Years Total debt $ 1,386.9 $ 250.3 $ 130.5 $ 226.8 $ 779.3 Convertible debt at maturity (3) 261.5 - - - 261.5 Interest payments on Senior Floating Rate Notes 4.2 3.3 0.9 - - Interest payments on 5.75% Senior Notes 301.9 34.5 69.0 69.0 129.4 Interest payments on Subordinated Convertible Notes 220.9 19.3 38.6 38.6 124.4 Operating leases (4) 150.9 40.3 67.3 29.4 13.9 Purchase obligations (5) 9.8 9.8 - - - Defined benefit pension obligations (6) 186.1 17.5 35.1 35.9 97.6 Postretirement benefits 5.0 0.7 1.2 1.1 2.0 Unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties (7) - - - - - Total $ 2,527.2 $ 375.7 $ 342.6 $ 400.8 $ 1,408.1 (1) This table does not include interest payments on General Cable's revolving credit facilities because the future amounts are based on variable interest rates and the amount of the borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility fluctuate depending upon the Company's working capital requirements.

(2) This table does not include derivative instruments as the ultimate cash outlays cannot be reasonably predicted. Refer to Note 10 - Financial Instruments and Item 7A - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk for additional information.

(3) Represents the current debt discount on the Company's Subordinated Convertible Notes as a result of adopting provisions of ASC 470 - Debt. Refer to Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional information.

(4) Operating lease commitments are described under "Off Balance Sheet Assets and Obligations." (5) Represents our firm purchase commitments on our forward pricing agreements as disclosed in Note 10 - Financial Instruments.

(6) Defined benefit pension obligations reflect actuarially projected benefit payments which may differ from funding requirements based on local laws and regulations through 2023.

(7) Unrecognized tax benefits of $72.8 million have not been reflected in the above table due to the inherent uncertainty as to the amount and timing of settlement, which is contingent upon the occurrence of possible future events, such as examinations and determinations by various tax authorities.

Off Balance Sheet Assets and Obligations General Cable has entered into various leases related principally to certain administrative, manufacturing and distribution facilities and transportation equipment. Future minimum rental payments required under non-cancelable lease agreements at December 31, 2013 were as follows: 2014 - $40.3 million, 2015 - $35.5 million, 2016 - $31.8 million, 2017 - $21.4 million, 2018 - $8.0 million and thereafter $13.9 million. Rental expense recorded in income from continuing operations was $47.0 million, $29.8 million and $20.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company had $150.7 million in letters of credit, $249.3 million in various performance bonds and $380.5 million in other guarantees oustanding. Other guarantees include bank guarantees and advance payment bonds. These letters of credit, performance bonds and guarantees are periodically renewed and are generally related to risk associated with self-insurance claims, defined benefit plan obligations, contract performance, quality and other various bank and financing guarantees. Advance payment bonds are often required by customers when we obtain advance payments to secure the production of cable for 36-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents long term contracts. The advance payment bonds provide the customer protection on their deposit in the event that the Company does not perform under the contract. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" for excess availability under the Company's various credit borrowings.

Environmental Matters The Company's expenditures for environmental compliance and remediation amounted to approximately $3.6 million, $3.5 million and $3.3 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In addition, certain of the Company's subsidiaries have been named as potentially responsible parties in proceedings that involve environmental remediation. The Company had accrued $3.1 million at December 31, 2013 for all environmental liabilities. Environmental matters are described in Item 1 - Business, Item 3 - Legal Proceedings and Note 18 - Commitments and Contingencies. While it is difficult to estimate future environmental liabilities, the Company does not currently anticipate any material adverse effect on results of operations, cash flows or financial position as a result of compliance with federal, state, local or foreign environmental laws or regulations or remediation costs.

Legal Matters Refer to Note 18 - Commitments and Contingencies for review of our litigation contingencies.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates The Company's Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A summary of significant accounting policies is provided in Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. The application of these policies requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience, information that is available to management about current events and actions the Company may take in the future and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The most critical judgments impacting the financial statements include those policies described below. In addition, significant estimates and judgments include allowances for accounts receivable and deferred income taxes; legal; inventory costing and valuation; share-based compensation; uncertain tax positions; assets and obligations related to pension and other postretirement benefits; goodwill and intangible valuations; financial instruments; and revenue recognized under the percentage-of-completion method. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from these estimates.

Revenue Recognition The majority of the Company's revenue is recognized when goods are shipped to the customer, title and risk of loss are transferred, pricing is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Most revenue transactions represent sales of inventory. A provision for payment discounts, product returns, warranty and customer rebates is estimated based upon historical experience and other relevant factors and is recorded within the same period that the revenue is recognized. The Company has a portion of long-term product installation contract revenue that is recognized based on the percentage-of-completion method generally based on the cost-to-cost method if there are reasonably reliable estimates of total revenue, total cost, and the extent of progress toward completion; and there is an enforceable agreement between parties who can fulfill their contractual obligations. Management reviews contract price and cost estimates periodically as the work progresses and reflects adjustments proportionate to the percentage-of-completion to income in the period when those estimates are revised. For these contracts, if a current estimate of total contract cost indicates a loss on a contract, the projected loss is recognized in full when determined.

Accounts Receivable The accounts receivable balance is recorded at the stated amount, less allowances for doubtful accounts, price discounts, and returns. At the time of the sale and at each quarter, the Company evaluates the accounts receivable balance to determine a best estimate for doubtful accounts, price discounts, and returns. The Company reviews general historical trends in the account, customer overdue balances, high risk accounts that have been specifically identified based on historical and current customer patterns, contractual obligations, and current economic conditions to determine an estimate for these allowances.

Inventory Costing and Valuation The Company values approximately 85% of the Company's inventory using the average cost method and all remaining inventories are valued using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. To determine if a lower of cost or market adjustment is required the Company evaluates evidence to indicate if the cost will be recovered with an approximately normal profit upon sale in the ordinary course of business based on product groupings within the reportable segments. Metal costs, particularly copper and aluminum costs, are significant to our overall costs in inventory. Factors such as technological innovations, future demand trends, pricing environment, inventory levels and turns and specific identification of inventory items, such as regulatory-related changes or changes in engineering or material, are considered in the obsolete and slow moving inventory analysis.

37-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents Pension Accounting General Cable provides retirement benefits through contributory and non-contributory qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans covering eligible domestic and international employees as well as through defined contribution plans and other postretirement benefits. Benefits under General Cable's qualified U.S. defined benefit pension plan generally are based on years of service multiplied by a specific fixed dollar amount, and benefits under the Company's qualified non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans generally are based on years of service and a variety of other factors that can include a specific fixed dollar amount or a percentage of either current salary or average salary over a specific period of time. The amounts funded for any plan year for the qualified U.S. defined benefit pension plan are neither less than the minimum required under federal law nor more than the maximum amount deductible for federal income tax purposes. General Cable's non-qualified unfunded U.S.

defined benefit pension plans include a plan that provides defined benefits to select senior management employees beyond those benefits provided by other programs. The Company's non-qualified unfunded non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans include plans that provide retirement indemnities to employees within the Company's European and Mediterranean and ROW businesses. Pension obligations for the non-qualified unfunded defined benefit pension plans are provided for by book reserves and are based on local practices and regulations of the respective countries. General Cable makes cash contributions for the costs of the non-qualified unfunded defined benefit pension plans as the benefits are paid.

Benefit costs for the defined benefit pension plans sponsored by General Cable are determined based principally upon certain actuarial assumptions, including the discount rate and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. The weighted-average discount rate used to determine the net pension expense for 2013 was 4.12% for the U.S. defined benefit pension plans. The weighted-average discount rate as of December 31, 2013 that was used to determine benefit obligations was 4.85% for the U.S. defined benefit pension plans, and was determined based on a review of long-term bonds that receive one of the two highest ratings given by a recognized rating agency which are expected to be available during the period to maturity of the projected pension benefit obligations and based on information received from actuaries. The weighted-average discount rate used to determine the net pension cost for 2013 was 4.26% for the non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans. Non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans followed a similar evaluation process based on financial markets in those countries where General Cable provides a defined benefit pension plan, and the weighted-average discount rate used to determine benefit obligations for General Cable's non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans was 4.36% as of December 31, 2013. General Cable's expense under both U.S. and non-U.S.

defined benefit pension plans is determined using the discount rate as of the beginning of the fiscal year, and as a result, 2014 expense for the defined benefit pension plans will be based on the weighted-average discount rate of 4.85% for U.S. plans and 4.36% for non-U.S. plans.

The weighted-average long-term expected rate of return on assets is based on input from actuaries, including their review of historical 10-year, 20-year, and 25-year rates of inflation and real rates of return on various broad equity and bond indices in conjunction with the diversification of the asset portfolio. The Company's overall investment strategy is to diversify its investments for the qualified U.S. defined benefit pension plan based on an asset allocation assumption of 65% allocated to equity investments, with an expected real rate of return of 8%, and 35% to fixed-income investments, with an expected real rate of return of 2%, and an assumed long-term rate of inflation of 3%. Equity investments primarily include investments in large-cap and mid-cap companies primarily located in the United States.

The determination of pension expense for the qualified defined benefit pension plans is based on the fair market value of assets as of the measurement date.

Investment gains and losses are recognized in the measurement of assets immediately. Such gains and losses will be amortized and recognized as part of the annual benefit cost to the extent that unrecognized net gains and losses from all sources exceed 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market value of assets.

The Company evaluates its actuarial assumptions at least annually, and adjusts them as necessary. The Company uses a measurement date of December 31 for all of its defined benefit pension plans. In 2013, pension expense for the Company's defined benefit pension plans was $20.6 million. Based on a weighted-average expected rate of return on plan assets of 6.66%, a weighted-average discount rate of 4.21% and various other assumptions, the Company estimates its 2014 pension expense for its defined benefit pension plans will decrease to approximately $14.9 million. A 1% decrease in the assumed discount rate would increase pension expense by approximately $5.5 million. Future pension expense will depend on future investment performance, changes in future discount rates and various other factors related to the populations participating in the plans.

In the event that actual results differ from the actuarial assumptions, the funded status of the defined benefit pension plans may change and any such change could result in a charge or credit to equity and an increase or decrease in future pension expense and cash contributions.

The Company's investment policies and strategies, categories of plan assets, fair value measurements of plan assets, and significant concentrations of risk are described in further detail in Note 12 - Employee Benefit Plans.

Income Taxes The Company is subject to income tax in numerous United States federal, state, and foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgments and estimates are inherent in determining the Company's consolidated income tax expense, current tax payable, deferred tax assets 38-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents and liabilities, and liabilities for uncertain tax positions. Future events such as changes in business conditions, tax legislation, tax audit resolutions, or foreign earnings repatriation plans could materially impact these estimates and the Company's tax position.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. At December 31, 2013, the Company had recorded a net deferred tax liability of $168.8 million ($49.3 million net current deferred tax asset less $218.1 million net long term deferred tax liability). The valuation of deferred tax assets is dependent on, among other things, the ability of the Company to generate a sufficient level of future taxable income. In estimating future taxable income, the Company has considered both positive and negative evidence, such as historical and forecasted results of operations, including prior losses, and has considered the implementation of prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. As of December 31, 2013, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $93.8 million to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount judged more likely than not to be realized. The Company has and will continue to review on a quarterly basis its assumptions and tax planning strategies, and, if the amount of the estimated realizable deferred tax assets is less than the amount currently on the balance sheet, the Company will reduce its deferred tax asset, recognizing a non-cash charge against reported earnings. Likewise, if the Company determines that a valuation allowance against a deferred tax asset is no longer appropriate, the adjustment to the valuation allowance would reduce income tax expense.

The Company operates in multiple jurisdictions with complex tax policies and regulations. In certain jurisdictions, the Company has taken tax positions that it believes are supportable, but which could be subject to challenge by the tax authorities. These tax positions are evaluated and liabilities for uncertain tax positions are established in accordance with the ASC 740- Income Taxes tax accounting guidance. The status of uncertain tax positions is reviewed in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as tax audits, rulings, and case law, and the related liabilities are adjusted accordingly.

The Company continuously monitors the deferred tax position of all business units to determine whether a valuation allowance should be recorded. Full valuation allowances are currently recorded against deferred tax assets in nine significant business units. The Company is closely monitoring the deferred tax asset situation in New Zealand. The New Zealand business unit has been operating at marginal profitability in recent years due to depressed economic conditions and increased competition in the local market. After weighing all positive and negative evidence and factoring in prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, management has judged that it is more likely than not that a future tax benefit for the New Zealand business's $5.6 million of net deferred tax assets will be realized. Future deterioration in the New Zealand unit's profitability could result in the need to record a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets in a subsequent period.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the income tax expense line in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. Accrued interest and penalties are included within the related tax liability line item in the consolidated balance sheet.

Long-Lived Assets, Goodwill and Impairment The valuation and classification of long-lived assets and the assignment of useful depreciable and amortizable lives and salvage values involve significant judgments and the use of estimates. The testing of these long-lived assets for impairment also requires a significant amount of judgment and assumptions, particularly as it relates to identification of asset groups and the determination of fair market value. The Company periodically evaluates the recoverability of the carrying amount of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. The Company evaluates events or changes in circumstances based on historical operating results, forecasts, general and industry trends and anticipated cash flows. Impairment is assessed when the undiscounted expected future cash flows derived from an asset are less than its carrying amount. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying value of an asset exceeds its fair value and are recognized in earnings. The Company also continually evaluates the estimated useful lives of all long-lived assets and, when warranted, revises such estimates based on current events.

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but are reviewed at least annually for impairment. The Company typically completes its annual impairment test within the fourth quarter of each year. In addition, the Company evaluates the carrying value between the valuations if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. Events or circumstances may include, but are not limited to, a significant change in legal factors or in the business climate, adverse action or assessment by a regulator, unanticipated competition, loss of key personnel, possible sale or disposal of a reporting unit or a significant portion of a reporting unit, significant changes in financial projections or significant changes in the market capitalization.

In September 2013, the Company began the review of the 2014 plan projections for the PDIC reporting unit. Based on preliminary results the Company noted the projected results for the 2013 forecast and the 2014 plan were significantly below the projections used for the 2012 impairment process, perhaps indicating a change in the business climate. Therefore, the Company decided to complete the 2013 goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment analysis as of September 27, 2013 due to this 39-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents impairment indicator for the PDIC reporting unit. The Company updated the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment analysis as of October 31, 2013, the annual impairment testing date. The results for the interim and the annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment analysis are detailed below.

During the evaluation of impairment, the Company compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount to determine if there is potential goodwill impairment. Our impairment testing for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles is performed separately. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the fair value of the goodwill within the reporting unit is less than the carrying value of the goodwill. The impairment test for the Company's indefinite-lived intangible assets involves comparing the fair value of the intangibles to their carrying values. If the carrying amount of an intangible asset with an indefinite life exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss would be recognized in the amount equal to the excess. If this fair value is less than the reporting unit's carrying value, a second step is required to measure the amount of impairment, if any. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, the second step is not required. The Company's market capitalization is a consideration during the annual impairment test. The reporting unit comprising the goodwill is only a portion of the entire company.

The company must apply assumptions to compare the Company's market capitalization to the reporting unit being assessed. First, a portion of the market capitalization is allocated to the reporting unit. This value is then increased by a control premium. To develop the control premium assumption, management considered other recent transactions within the industry and the control premium realized in those transactions.

The Company performed the first step of the goodwill impairment assessment. In Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test, the Company compared the fair value of the reporting unit, the entities purchased in the October 31, 2007 PDIC acquisition, to its carrying amount, including goodwill as of September 27, 2013. Based on the results of the valuation, the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the carrying value; therefore, it was determined that no impairment existed. Step 2 was not required.

To determine the fair value of the reporting unit at the interim date and the annual impairment testing date, the Company employs an income and market-based approach with each being weighted equally. Under the income approach, the Company uses a discounted cash flow method to calculate the fair value based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Assumptions used in the discounted cash flow method, such as forecasted operating results, expected growth rates, working capital needs, tax rates, and cost of capital, are based on the current market conditions and are consistent with internal management projections. The cost of capital rate selected is based on consideration of the risks inherent in the investment and market rates of return available from alternative investments of similar type and quality as of the valuation date.

The guideline public company method is used for the market approach. The approach provides an estimate of value using multiples of earnings derived from the market values of publicly traded companies in the cable and wire industry.

In addition to the selection of guideline companies, the market approach includes an analysis of the Company's financial and operating performance, risk, profitability, and growth as compared to the reporting unit.

The Company's interim impairment test, as of September 27, 2013, for both goodwill and indefinite lived intangibles assets, indicated there was no impairment. The carrying value of the goodwill at the PDIC reporting unit was $165.1 million as of September 27, 2013. While the Company believes that the assumptions and estimates utilized in the testing are appropriate, multiples of earnings, future changes in judgments, assumptions and estimates that are used in our annual impairment testing, including discount and tax rates, future cash flow projections, or the Company's stock price, could result in significantly different estimates of fair value. For the September 2013 impairment analysis, the Company used a discount rate of 11.5% and a residual growth rate of 4.6%.

The discount rate used in the prior year was 12%. The decrease was primarily due to lower relevered betas expected for comparable business or economic fundamentals impacting the reporting unit compared to the prior year. The residual growth rate decreased compared with the rate utilized in the 2012 impairment analysis due to lower expected long-term GDP growth for countries in which the reporting unit operates. As noted, changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the results of Step 1 of the goodwill impairment tests. For example, an increase in the discount rate of 100 basis points or a decrease in the residual growth rate of 110 basis points would result in a decrease to the fair value of $62 million and $27 million, respectively. The fair value would still exceed the carrying value if these changes were made when employing an income and market-based approach. Overall, a decrease of 5% in the estimated fair value of any of the Company's reporting units would not result in a failure of Step 1.

The Company's annual impairment test, as of October 31, 2013, for both goodwill and indefinite lived intangibles assets, indicated there was no impairment. The carrying value of the goodwill at the PDIC reporting unit was $161.6 million as of December 31, 2013. While the Company believes that the assumptions and estimates utilized in the testing are appropriate, multiples of earnings, future changes in judgments, assumptions and estimates that are used in our annual impairment testing, including discount and tax rates, future cash flow projections, or the Company's stock price, could result in significantly different estimates of fair value. For the 2013 annual impairment analysis, the Company used a discount rate of 11.5% and a residual growth rate of 4.6%. The assumptions were consistent with the interim impairment test as of September 27, 2013. As noted, changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the results of Step 1 of the goodwill impairment tests. For example, an increase in the discount rate of 100 basis points or a decrease in the residual growth rate of 110 basis points would result in a decrease to the fair value of $63 million and $27 million, respectively. The fair value would still exceed the carrying value if these changes were made when 40-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents employing an income and market-based approach. Overall, a decrease of 4% in the estimated fair value of any of the Company's reporting units would not result in a failure of Step 1.

At December 31, 2013, the Company noted there were no events that occurred or circumstances that changed that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. At December 31, 2013, the Company's market capitalization was less than the Company's net assets but consistent with the market capitalization at the goodwill impairment testing performed as of October 31, 2013; therefore, no additional impairment indicators were noted. Refer to the Venezuelan Operations disclosure below for details regarding foreign exchange laws that were announced in January 2014, that could have an effect on the projected results of the PDIC reporting unit in 2014.

The Company performed the first step of the indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment test. In Step 1 of the impairment test, the Company determined the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible assets exceeded their carrying value; therefore, it was determined that no impairment existed. Step 2 was not required.

Intangible assets that are not deemed to have indefinite lives are amortized over their useful lives.

Share-Based Compensation There are certain employees with various forms of share-based payment awards for which the Company recognizes compensation costs for these awards based on their fair values. The fair values of certain awards are estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing formula, which incorporates certain assumptions regarding the expected term of an award and expected stock price volatility. The Company will develop the expected term assumptions based on the vesting period and contractual term of an award, historical exercise and post-vesting cancellation experience, stock price history, plan provisions that require exercise or cancellation of awards after employees terminate, and the extent to which currently available information indicates that the future is reasonably expected to differ from past experience. The Company develops the expected volatility assumptions based on the monthly historical price data from the Company's common stock and other economic data trended into future years.

After calculating the aggregate fair value of an award, the Company uses an estimated forfeiture rate to discount the amount of share-based compensation costs to be recognized in the operating results over the service period of the award. The Company develops the forfeiture assumption based on its historical pre-vesting cancellation experience. Key assumptions are described in further detail in Note 14 - Share-Based Compensation.

New Accounting Standards A discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements is described in Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in Item 8 - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Report, and we incorporate such discussion in this MD&A by reference and make it a part hereof.

Venezuelan Operations On February 13, 2013 the Venezuelan government announced the devaluation of its currency from 4.30 BsF per U.S. dollar to 6.30 BsF per U.S. dollar. Due to the impact of the devaluation of its currency by the Venezuelan government, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $40.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily related to the remeasurement of the local balance sheet on the date of the devaluation at the 6.30 BsF per U.S. dollar rate. The functional currency of the Company's subsidiary in Venezuela is the U.S.

dollar. In March 2013, the Venezuelan government announced the creation of a new alternative currency exchange system ("SICAD"), which is intended to complement CADIVI; however at December 31, 2013 the Company was still able to import copper at the official CADIVI rate. The Company remeasures the financial statements of its Venezuelan subsidiary at the rate which the Company expects to remit dividends, which is the official CADIVI rate, 6.30 BsF per U.S. dollar rate, at December 31, 2013.

On January 24, 2014, the Venezuelan government announced the establishment of a dual exchange rate system. A rate of 6.30 BsF per U.S. dollar will be applied to priority sectors, while other sectors of the economy will apply an exchange rate determined based on the results of the Venezuelan central bank's system of weekly currency auctions. The SICAD auction rate is a floating rate, and the potential exists for additional financial impacts if the auction rate changes significantly. The Company has assessed a number of factors, including the limited number of SICAD auctions held to date, the Company's inability to access the SICAD exchange to date, the restrictions placed on eligible participants, the sectors that can apply the 6.30 BsF per U.S. dollar rate, the amount of U.S.

Dollars available for purchase through the auction process, and the historical lack of official information about the resulting SICAD rate. At this time, based upon its assessment, the Company does not believe it would be appropriate to use rates from the SICAD exchange system for financial reporting purposes at December 31, 2013. While the Company continues to evaluate the impact of these actions by the Venezuelan government, depending on the exchange rate the Company is required to apply to its financial statements, it may incur a charge to earnings in 2014. If the Company is required to apply an exchange rate of 11.3 BsF per U.S. dollar (the rate per the SICAD auction system at January 24, 2014) to its financial statements, the Company estimates it could result in a pre-tax charge of approximately $75 million to $85 million.

41-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents In addition to exchange controls, the Venezuelan president has used decree power to pass the Law of Costs, Earnings, and Fair Profits, which became effective in January 2014, authorizing, among other things, the Venezuelan government to set maximum profit margins in the private sector. Therefore, the majority of the Company's product portfolio in Venezuela is subject to price controls, which may restrict the Company's ability to increase prices to offset the impact of continuing high inflation on product, labor and other operating costs. At this time, the Company is not able to predict the future economic impact of these announcements and continues to monitor developments.

At December 31, 2013, the estimated fair value of the goodwill at our PDIC reporting unit, which includes results of the operations in Venezuela, exceeded its corresponding carrying amount including recorded goodwill as noted above.

However, a prolonged significant estimated decline in the operating results of the Venezuelan subsidiary due to the aforementioned foreign exchange control laws, that were announced in January 2014, could result in impairment of goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangible assets at our PDIC reporting unit in 2014.

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company's total assets in Venezuela were $367.3 million and $348.2 million and total liabilities were $102.7 million and $108.2 million, respectively. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, included within total assets were BsF denominated monetary assets of $238.3 million and $202.2 million, which consisted primarily of $194.0 million and $142.1 million of cash, and $39.6 million and $56.9 million of accounts receivable, respectively. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, included within total liabilities were BsF denominated monetary liabilities of $65.1 million and $73.2 million, which consisted primarily of accounts payable and other accruals. All monetary assets and liabilities were remeasured at 6.30 BsF per U.S. dollar at December 31, 2013.

Sales in Venezuela were 4% of our consolidated net sales for each of the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. Operating income in Venezuela was 31% and 29% of our consolidated operating income for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2013, Venezuela's sales and cost of goods sold were approximately 99% and 41% BsF denominated and approximately 1% and 59% U.S. dollar denominated, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2012, Venezuela's sales and cost of goods sold were approximately 98% and 39% BsF denominated and approximately 2% and 61% U.S.

dollar denominated, respectively. A 10% increase (decrease) in the official exchange rate would decrease (increase) Venezuela's sales and cost of goods sold on an annual basis by approximately $21.1 million and approximately ($6.0 million), respectively.

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company settled $55.9 million and $83.3 million of U.S. dollar denominated intercompany payables and accounts payable in Venezuela, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2013 settlements were made at the rate of 4.30 BsF per U.S. dollar on U.S.

dollar denominated intercompany payables and accounts payable. Settlements were made at the rate of of 4.30 BsF per U.S. dollar on U.S. dollar denominated intercompany payables and accounts payable in the year ended December 31, 2013 because the authorization for copper imports was submitted prior to the devaluation on February 13, 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, all transactions were settled at the 4.30 BsF per U.S. dollar rate, the official rate during this time. At December 31, 2013, $37.6 million of requests of U.S.

dollars to settle U.S. dollar denominated intercompany payables remained pending with CADIVI, which we expect will be settled at the 6.30 BsF per U.S. dollar rate. Approximately $22.4 million of the requested settlements have been pending up to 30 days, $15.1 million have been pending up to 180 days, and $0.1 million have pending over 180 days. Currency exchange controls in Venezuela continue to limit our ability to remit funds from Venezuela. We do not consider the net assets of Venezuela to be integral to our ability to service our debt and operational requirements.

42-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents

[ Back To Technology News's Homepage ]

OTHER NEWS PROVIDERS







Technology Marketing Corporation

800 Connecticut Ave, 1st Floor East, Norwalk, CT 06854 USA
Ph: 800-243-6002, 203-852-6800
Fx: 203-866-3326

General comments: tmc@tmcnet.com.
Comments about this site: webmaster@tmcnet.com.

STAY CURRENT YOUR WAY

© 2014 Technology Marketing Corporation. All rights reserved.