|
| [February 07, 2013] |
 |
Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Suit against Mellanox Technologies, Ltd
NEW YORK --(Business Wire)--
Robbins
Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP ("Robbins Geller") (http://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases/mellanox/)
today announced that a class action has been commenced in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of
all persons or entities who purchased the common stock of Mellanox (News - Alert)
Technologies, Ltd. ("Mellanox" or the "Company") (NASDAQ:MLNX) between
April 19, 2012 and January 2, 2013 (the "Class Period").
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later
than 60 days from today. If you wish to discuss this action or have any
questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please
contact plaintiff's counsel, Samuel
H. Rudman or David
A. Rosenfeld of Robbins Geller at 800/449-4900 or 619/231-1058, or
via e-mail at djr@rgrdlaw.com. If
you are a member of this class, you can view a copy of the complaint as
filed or join this class action online at http://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases/mellanox/.
Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead
plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing
and remain an absent class member.
The complaint charges Mellanox and certain of its officers and directors
with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Mellanox
produces and supplies interconnect products for computing, storage, and
communication applications in the computing, Web 2.0, storage, financial
services, database, and Cloud markets. Mellanox's most lucrative product
offering at the start of the Class Period was its InfiniBand product.
InfiniBand technology is used to transfer and store data in high-end
computing and data centers.
The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants issued
materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's
financial performance and future prospects. According to the complaint,
the true facts, which were known or recklessly disregarded by each of
the defendants but concealed from the investing public during the Class
Period, were as follows: (i) Mellanox was receiving a continuous stream
of customer complaints concerning glitches in its InfiniBand product;
(ii) Mellanox knew that the pace of a competitor's development of its
own InfiniBand adaptor would diminish Mellanox's product offering and
increase competition in the InfiniBand market in which Mellanox enjoyed
a near monopoly; (iii) Mellanox knew that its outsized first and second
quarter 2012 sales growth was not sustainable and was not the result of
defendants' business acumen or growth in the InfiniBand market; (iv)
Mellanox's inventory was dramatically increasing, both at the Company
and in the hands of at least one significant customer, which would
decrease sales and profit margins going forward; and (v) as a result,
Mellanox knew its actual sales growth supported neither its own fourth
quarter 2012 guidance nor the inflated share price targets the
investment community was modeling based on defendants' bullish Class
Period statements and guidance.
According to the complaint, through a series of partial disclosures made
between September 7, 2012 and January 3, 2013, the market learned that
the Company's business was not as defendants had portrayed it throughout
the Class Period. On September 7, 2012, Mellanox shares were downgraded
from Buy to Hold. Then on October 18, 2012, Mellanox reported third
quarter 2012 financial results and issued lower than expected fourth
quarter 2012 fiscal guidance. Finally, at the end of the day on January
2, 2013, defendants were forced to concede that Mellanox had grossly
missed its fourth quarter 2012 revenue guidance by upwards of 20%. This
news, along with the earlier negative announcements, shocked the market
causing the price of Mellanox stock to fall precipitously, on unusually
high trading volume.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of
Mellanox common stock during the Class Period (the "Class"). The
plaintiff is represented by Robbins Geller, which has expertise in
prosecuting investor class actions and extensive experience in actions
involving financial fraud.
Robbins Geller represents U.S. and international institutional investors
in contingency-based securities and corporate litigation. With nearly
200 lawyers in nine offices, the firm represents hundreds of public and
multi-employer pension funds with combined assets under management in
excess of $2 trillion. The firm has obtained many of the largest
recoveries and has been ranked number one in the number of shareholder
class action recoveries in MSCI's Top SCAS 50 every year since
2003. According to Cornerstone Research, the firm's recoveries have
averaged 35% above the median for all firms over the past seven years
(2005-2011). Please visit http://www.rgrdlaw.com
for more information.

[ Back To Technology News's Homepage ]
|